Shaving Bytes on JavaScript Conditionals
Whenever you work with JavaScript code, it's as though there's always a shorter way to code something. You thought that a code set was basic until you found out that something was basic...er. One of those code shortcuts can be found with conditions, specifically short if clauses.
A typical short if clause would look something like this:
if(callback) {
callback();
}
Oddly enough this conditional can be made shorter:
callback && callback();
The && is less code than the if(){}; of course only by a few characters but does the same job. You could argue that readability suffers but that's up to individual developers.
![9 More Mind-Blowing WebGL Demos]()
With Firefox OS, asm.js, and the push for browser performance improvements, canvas and WebGL technologies are opening a world of possibilities. I featured 9 Mind-Blowing Canvas Demos and then took it up a level with 9 Mind-Blowing WebGL Demos, but I want to outdo...
![Page Visibility API]()
One event that's always been lacking within the document is a signal for when the user is looking at a given tab, or another tab. When does the user switch off our site to look at something else? When do they come back?
![Generate Dojo GFX Drawings from SVG Files]()
One of the most awesome parts of the Dojo / Dijit / DojoX family is the amazing GFX library. GFX lives within the dojox.gfx namespace and provides the foundation of Dojo's charting, drawing, and sketch libraries. GFX allows you to create vector graphics (SVG, VML...
![HTML5’s placeholder Attribute]()
HTML5 has introduced many features to the browser; some HTML-based, some in the form of JavaScript APIs, but all of them useful. One of my favorites if the introduction of the placeholder attribute to INPUT elements. The placeholder attribute shows text in a field until the...
It’s worth noting that JS minifiers like Google’s Closure Compiler will do this for you, so the first option is probably better so you get the readability without sacrificing performance. The Closure Compiler outputs it as this:
callback&&callback();
http://closure-compiler.appspot.com/home
and also jshint might shout about the shorter version (depending on the settings of course).
No one writes code for JSHint :)
It’s bad practice though because the code is hard to maintain, debug and extend. I could write a whole blog on why doing this is bad. I see zero benefits.
Agree with comments above. I recently realized that there is no benefits of having expressions in my code so changed jshint settings and now it disallows to use them.
IMO the expression below is pretty readable and it also takes one line:
if (callback) callback();
Agree with the “bad practice” comments.
Sometimes you seem to post stuff just for the sake of it, or to impress beginners.
I appreciate your honesty but impressing people isn’t something that entertains me.
What if I also need to have an else branch?
There’s only “if”, I suppose. Otherwise it’s something like:
While I agree with people’s comments on code readability, I still appreciate posts like this.
I’ve come across the ‘callback && callback();’ syntax before and had to look up wtf was going on. Had I read this post earlier, I would’ve known :)
@Dan i agree with you, posts like this are handy so you understand when you come across it in a project. Sadly, this is clearly lost on a couple of the previous commenters who already know everything there is to know.
I’m not worried about them.
What setting will make jsHint happy?
Code is better than anything, 2 JsPerf :
– http://jsperf.com/if-statement-verses-and-operator
– http://jsperf.com/ternary-vs-and-or-vs-if-else
Readability is important, but for those who like to hyper-optimize their code, this is a great tip.