Prototype’s Element.on with MooTools
Prototype 1.7RC1 was released on Monday. While the big news with this release appears to be the implementation of John Resig's Sizzle selector engine, what caught my eye was the new on method. This new Element.on method is very similar to Prototype's Element.observe method but with a few enhancements (event relaying, event stop). While I don't necessarily care about the enhancements, I simply love that the event method is called "on." Using "on" as the method name makes it sound more like the event itself. Here's how easy it is to use "on" instead of "addEvent" for your events.
The MooTools JavaScript
/* the directive */
Element.alias('addEvent','on');
/* the usage */
$('myElement').on('click',fn);
Using on instead of addEvent is as easy as a quick MooTools Element.alias directive.
It's weird that I like "on" so much considering a generally don't like jQuery's css and attr methods. Oh well. Congrats to the Prototype team for their impending release.
![Conquering Impostor Syndrome]()
Two years ago I documented my struggles with Imposter Syndrome and the response was immense. I received messages of support and commiseration from new web developers, veteran engineers, and even persons of all experience levels in other professions. I've even caught myself reading the post...
![JavaScript Promise API]()
While synchronous code is easier to follow and debug, async is generally better for performance and flexibility. Why "hold up the show" when you can trigger numerous requests at once and then handle them when each is ready? Promises are becoming a big part of the JavaScript world...
![CSS Ellipsis Beginning of String]()
I was incredibly happy when CSS text-overflow: ellipsis (married with fixed width and overflow: hidden was introduced to the CSS spec and browsers; the feature allowed us to stop trying to marry JavaScript width calculation with string width calculation and truncation. CSS ellipsis was also very friendly to...
![WebSocket and Socket.IO]()
My favorite web technology is quickly becoming the WebSocket API. WebSocket provides a welcomed alternative to the AJAX technologies we've been making use of over the past few years. This new API provides a method to push messages from client to server efficiently...
Hi David. Nice idea. I like also css() and other jQuery methods’ name (for their simplicity), but I prefer Mootools core. So, why not:
Element.alias('addEvent','on'); Element.implement({ 'css': function(p, v) { if (v == undefined) return this.getStyle(p); else return this.setStyle(p, v); }, 'attr': function(a, v) { if (v == undefined) return this.getProperty(a); else return this.setProperty(a, v); }, 'html': function(h) { if (h == undefined) return this.get('html'); else return this.set('html', h); });What do you think?
@Lorenzo S.: I’ve done posts like that in the past. I can’t stand .css and .attr for MooTools, but what you have would work.
@Lorenzo S.: If you want jQuery syntax in MooTools, have a look at this repository: http://github.com/cheeaun/mooj/blob/master/mooj.js
@David
Fully agree with “on” seems acceptable, whereas .css, .attr etc. doesn’t :)
I guess the reason you might like “on” – when not other jQuery shortcuts – might be due to we’re used to “on” in “onClick” etc. for regular JavaScript, which probably makes the mind having positive thoughts.
Great advice, thanks a lot.
However, how much slower will this be? I mean, will on() trigger addEvent() and that in turn will trigger whatever internal functions are used?