Prototype’s Element.on with MooTools
Prototype 1.7RC1 was released on Monday. While the big news with this release appears to be the implementation of John Resig's Sizzle selector engine, what caught my eye was the new on method. This new Element.on method is very similar to Prototype's Element.observe method but with a few enhancements (event relaying, event stop). While I don't necessarily care about the enhancements, I simply love that the event method is called "on." Using "on" as the method name makes it sound more like the event itself. Here's how easy it is to use "on" instead of "addEvent" for your events.
The MooTools JavaScript
/* the directive */
Element.alias('addEvent','on');
/* the usage */
$('myElement').on('click',fn);
Using on instead of addEvent is as easy as a quick MooTools Element.alias directive.
It's weird that I like "on" so much considering a generally don't like jQuery's css and attr methods. Oh well. Congrats to the Prototype team for their impending release.
![CSS @supports]()
Feature detection via JavaScript is a client side best practice and for all the right reasons, but unfortunately that same functionality hasn't been available within CSS. What we end up doing is repeating the same properties multiple times with each browser prefix. Yuck. Another thing we...
![Create a Sheen Logo Effect with CSS]()
I was inspired when I first saw Addy Osmani's original ShineTime blog post. The hover sheen effect is simple but awesome. When I started my blog redesign, I really wanted to use a sheen effect with my logo. Using two HTML elements and...
![MooTools Zoomer Plugin]()
I love to look around the MooTools Forge. As someone that creates lots of plugins, I get a lot of joy out of seeing what other developers are creating and possibly even how I could improve them. One great plugin I've found is...
![:valid, :invalid, and :required CSS Pseudo Classes]()
Let's be honest, form validation with JavaScript can be a real bitch. On a real basic level, however, it's not that bad. HTML5 has jumped in to some extent, providing a few attributes to allow us to mark fields as required or only valid if matching...
Hi David. Nice idea. I like also css() and other jQuery methods’ name (for their simplicity), but I prefer Mootools core. So, why not:
Element.alias('addEvent','on'); Element.implement({ 'css': function(p, v) { if (v == undefined) return this.getStyle(p); else return this.setStyle(p, v); }, 'attr': function(a, v) { if (v == undefined) return this.getProperty(a); else return this.setProperty(a, v); }, 'html': function(h) { if (h == undefined) return this.get('html'); else return this.set('html', h); });What do you think?
@Lorenzo S.: I’ve done posts like that in the past. I can’t stand .css and .attr for MooTools, but what you have would work.
@Lorenzo S.: If you want jQuery syntax in MooTools, have a look at this repository: http://github.com/cheeaun/mooj/blob/master/mooj.js
@David
Fully agree with “on” seems acceptable, whereas .css, .attr etc. doesn’t :)
I guess the reason you might like “on” – when not other jQuery shortcuts – might be due to we’re used to “on” in “onClick” etc. for regular JavaScript, which probably makes the mind having positive thoughts.
Great advice, thanks a lot.
However, how much slower will this be? I mean, will on() trigger addEvent() and that in turn will trigger whatever internal functions are used?