Sum an Array of Numbers with JavaScript
It's rare that I'm disappointed by the JavaScript language not having a function that I need. One such case was summing an array of numbers -- I was expecting Math.sum
or a likewise, baked in API. Fear not -- summing an array of numbers is easy using Array.prototype.reduce
!
const numbers = [1, 2, 3, 4];
const sum = numbers.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0);
The 0
represents the starting value while with a
and b
, one represents the running total with the other representing the value to be added. You'll also note that using reduce
prevents side effects! I'd still prefer something like Math.sum(...numbers)
but a simple reduce
will do!
![9 Mind-Blowing WebGL Demos]()
As much as developers now loathe Flash, we're still playing a bit of catch up to natively duplicate the animation capabilities that Adobe's old technology provided us. Of course we have canvas, an awesome technology, one which I highlighted 9 mind-blowing demos. Another technology available...
![Conquering Impostor Syndrome]()
Two years ago I documented my struggles with Imposter Syndrome and the response was immense. I received messages of support and commiseration from new web developers, veteran engineers, and even persons of all experience levels in other professions. I've even caught myself reading the post...
![CSS Text Overlap]()
One of the important functions of CSS is to position elements.
Margin
, padding
, top
, left
, right
, bottom
, position
, and z-index
are just a few of the major players in CSS positioning.
By using the above spacing...
![CSS Background Animations]()
Background animations are an awesome touch when used correctly. In the past, I used MooTools to animate a background position. Luckily these days CSS animations are widely supported enough to rely on them to take over JavaScript-based animation tasks. The following simple CSS snippet animates...
Initializing with 0 might not be necessary since it takes the value from the first item in the array if not provided (and then skips the first item for the rest). It’s very slightly slower to set it to 0.
Here’s what I wonder though… Suppose this were in some
math.js
module. Would it besum(nums)
orsum(...nums)
?sum([1,2,3])
orsum(1,2,3)
? I kinda prefer the latter.