JavaScript Class Privates

By  on  

One of my aspects of JavaScript that drew me to it as a young developers was that its syntax was loose and I could code quickly. As you gain experience as an engineer, you start to realize that some traditional coding structure is a good thing, even if it slows you down. Using Jest or TypeScript to add typing to your JavaScript can save you from maintenance headaches and unexpected errors, for example. While those are pre-compile tools to accomplish structure, we've traditionally employed vanilla JavaScript patterns to mock private variables and methods in JavaScript.

Did you know, however, that browsers and the JavaScript language support a specific syntax for creating private variables and functions in classes? Let's have a look!

Properties and methods on a class have always been considered public; to make a property or method private, add a # at the beginning of their name:

class Developer {
  name;
  #age; // Don't tell anyone my age!

  constructor(name, age) {
    this.name = name;
    this.#age = age;
  }
};

const David = new Developer('David', 38);

console.log(David.name); // David
console.log(David.age);  // undefined
console.log(David.#age); // Error!  Uncaught SyntaxError: Private field '#age' must be declared in an enclosing class

David.name is available because name is public, while age is private because it's declared with a #. Similarly we can declare a private method with #:

class Developer {
  name;
  #age; // Don't tell anyone my age!

  constructor(name, age) {
    this.name = name;
    this.#age = age;
  }

  #getAgeInDogYears() {
    return this.#age * 7;
  }
};

getAgeInDogYears is only allowed to be called from within the class itself due to being declared with #. We can expose any information from within the class, public or private, if we make it available by public method:

class Developer {
  name = '';
  #age = 0;
  #ageInDogYears = 0;

  constructor(name, age) {
    this.name = name;
    this.#age = age;

    this.#ageInDogYears = this.#getAgeInDogYears();
  }

  #getAgeInDogYears() {
    return this.#age * 7;
  }

  log() {
    console.log(this.name);
    console.log(this.#age);
    console.log(this.#ageInDogYears);
  }
};

const David = new Developer('David', 38);
David.log();

// David
// 38
// 266

Adding a native syntax for declaring private class properties and methods is a welcomed addition to JavaScript; even better is that you can do so by simply adding a # to the beginning of its name.

Have you written code using private syntax in JavaScript? How was the experience?!

Recent Features

  • By
    Interview with a Pornhub Web Developer

    Regardless of your stance on pornography, it would be impossible to deny the massive impact the adult website industry has had on pushing the web forward. From pushing the browser's video limits to pushing ads through WebSocket so ad blockers don't detect them, you have...

  • By
    Regular Expressions for the Rest of Us

    Sooner or later you'll run across a regular expression. With their cryptic syntax, confusing documentation and massive learning curve, most developers settle for copying and pasting them from StackOverflow and hoping they work. But what if you could decode regular expressions and harness their power? In...

Incredible Demos

  • By
    CSS Filters

    CSS filter support recently landed within WebKit nightlies. CSS filters provide a method for modifying the rendering of a basic DOM element, image, or video. CSS filters allow for blurring, warping, and modifying the color intensity of elements. Let's have...

  • By
    Use Custom Missing Image Graphics Using Dojo

    A few months back I posted an article about how you can use your own "missing image" graphics when an image fails to load using MooTools and jQuery. Here's how to do the same using Dojo. The HTML We'll delegate the image to display by class...

Discussion

  1. Lynn Eriksen

    the way they have done private variables is garbage
    symptomatic of the slow pace and lack of creativity in the language these days

  2. It does feel hacky to me, to have added private properties to objects. We already *have* this, in the sense that closures contain private variables and functions but expose the privileged accessors.

    **Is** there a valid use-case for private properties on classes that isn’t cleaner and easier with Factories/Modules/closures?

  3. Hacky is fine as far as I’m concerned. I just want stuff to work as advertised. Was doing fine until Closure Compiler choked and I have to take a step backward to keep it going.

Wrap your code in <pre class="{language}"></pre> tags, link to a GitHub gist, JSFiddle fiddle, or CodePen pen to embed!