Retrieving requestAnimationFrame with JavaScript
The requestAnimationFrame function has been a major boost to developers creating and managing animations with JavaScript. Paul Irish has an excellent introduction on requestAnimationFrame -- I highly recommend you read it. This HTML5Hub post is also very good. Most browsers now support the animation function but in the case a browser doesn't, you can shim a rough equivalent with setInterval:
var requestAnimationFrame = window.requestAnimationFrame
|| window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame
|| window.mozRequestAnimationFrame
|| window.msRequestAnimationFrame
|| function(callback) { return setTimeout(callback, 1000 / 60); };
requestAnimationFrame was implemented with browser prefixes so we'll check for those if the unprefixed window method isn't there. If no native implementation exists, a setInterval shim will have to do!
![CSS vs. JS Animation: Which is Faster?]()
How is it possible that JavaScript-based animation has secretly always been as fast — or faster — than CSS transitions? And, how is it possible that Adobe and Google consistently release media-rich mobile sites that rival the performance of native apps?
This article serves as a point-by-point...
![Interview with a Pornhub Web Developer]()
Regardless of your stance on pornography, it would be impossible to deny the massive impact the adult website industry has had on pushing the web forward. From pushing the browser's video limits to pushing ads through WebSocket so ad blockers don't detect them, you have...
![Create a 3D Panorama Image with A-Frame]()
In the five years I've been at Mozilla I've seen some awesome projects. Some of them very popular, some of them very niche, but none of them has inspired me the way the MozVR team's work with WebVR and A-Frame project have.
A-Frame is a community project...
![dat.gui: Exceptional JavaScript Interface Controller]()
We all love trusted JavaScript frameworks like MooTools, jQuery, and Dojo, but there's a big push toward using focused micro-frameworks for smaller purposes. Of course, there are positives and negatives to using them. Positives include smaller JS footprint (especially good for mobile) and less cruft, negatives...
According to caniuse, Microsoft’s browsers never had a vendor prefixed version of
requestAnimationFrame, so we can just keepmozandwebkit.That’s a very common way to normalize the function, but in most recent implementations
requestAnimationFramepasses an argument to the callback function, which is the amount of milliseconds sinceperformance.timing.navigationStart, with micro precision too. This can be very handy for the callback.It’s not really possible to perfectly emulate this, but you can get something close if you take note of the epoch time as soon as the script is executed. So this is how I used to polyfill
requestAnimationFrame:(function(start) { window.requestAnimationFrame = function(callback) { return setInterval(function() { callback(new Date().getTime() - start); }, 1000 / 60); }; })(new Date().getTime());(Well, not exactly… since most of the times
requestAnimationFrameis called again in the callback function, but the function itself takes some milliseconds at least to be executed – because it probably involves some kind of repaint – and you should adjust the time interval accordingly, or you may never hope to even get close to 60 fps.)Also, don’t forget to normalize
cancelAnimationFrame, which has a nasty variant in some (and maybe forgotten?) WebKit browsers:webkitCancelRequestAnimationFrame.