Retrieving requestAnimationFrame with JavaScript
The requestAnimationFrame function has been a major boost to developers creating and managing animations with JavaScript. Paul Irish has an excellent introduction on requestAnimationFrame -- I highly recommend you read it. This HTML5Hub post is also very good. Most browsers now support the animation function but in the case a browser doesn't, you can shim a rough equivalent with setInterval:
var requestAnimationFrame = window.requestAnimationFrame
|| window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame
|| window.mozRequestAnimationFrame
|| window.msRequestAnimationFrame
|| function(callback) { return setTimeout(callback, 1000 / 60); };
requestAnimationFrame was implemented with browser prefixes so we'll check for those if the unprefixed window method isn't there. If no native implementation exists, a setInterval shim will have to do!
![Create Namespaced Classes with MooTools]()
MooTools has always gotten a bit of grief for not inherently using and standardizing namespaced-based JavaScript classes like the Dojo Toolkit does. Many developers create their classes as globals which is generally frowned up. I mostly disagree with that stance, but each to their own. In any event...
![CSS Filters]()
CSS filter support recently landed within WebKit nightlies. CSS filters provide a method for modifying the rendering of a basic DOM element, image, or video. CSS filters allow for blurring, warping, and modifying the color intensity of elements. Let's have...
![Build a Slick and Simple MooTools Accordion]()
Last week I covered a smooth, subtle MooTools effect called Kwicks. Another great MooTools creation is the Accordion, which acts like...wait for it...an accordion! Now I've never been a huge Weird Al fan so this is as close to playing an accordion as...
![Using jQuery and MooTools Together]()
There's yet another reason to master more than one JavaScript library: you can use some of them together! Since MooTools is prototype-based and jQuery is not, jQuery and MooTools may be used together on the same page.
The XHTML and JavaScript
jQuery is namespaced so the...
According to caniuse, Microsoft’s browsers never had a vendor prefixed version of
requestAnimationFrame, so we can just keepmozandwebkit.That’s a very common way to normalize the function, but in most recent implementations
requestAnimationFramepasses an argument to the callback function, which is the amount of milliseconds sinceperformance.timing.navigationStart, with micro precision too. This can be very handy for the callback.It’s not really possible to perfectly emulate this, but you can get something close if you take note of the epoch time as soon as the script is executed. So this is how I used to polyfill
requestAnimationFrame:(function(start) { window.requestAnimationFrame = function(callback) { return setInterval(function() { callback(new Date().getTime() - start); }, 1000 / 60); }; })(new Date().getTime());(Well, not exactly… since most of the times
requestAnimationFrameis called again in the callback function, but the function itself takes some milliseconds at least to be executed – because it probably involves some kind of repaint – and you should adjust the time interval accordingly, or you may never hope to even get close to 60 fps.)Also, don’t forget to normalize
cancelAnimationFrame, which has a nasty variant in some (and maybe forgotten?) WebKit browsers:webkitCancelRequestAnimationFrame.