Simple Username Creation Validation with PHP
When I create login areas (mostly intranets) for small websites, I'm always asked by the customer to keep
usernames to letters and numbers. That means no email addresses as usernames
and special characters like "_", "-", and ".". This, in my customer's mind,
keeps the login easy for their users and limits the number of support calls
they will receive. While I don't recommend disallowing common username
characters like the ones cited above, I do understand their need for simplicity.
Here's how, using PHP, I validate that a username is only letters and numbers.
The PHP
function validate_username($input,$pattern = '[^A-Za-z0-9]')
{
return !ereg($pattern,$input);
}
It's as easy as that. I don't go as far as using this for passwords, but you could if you wanted to. I'll also mention that if I want to allow non-alphanumeric characters, I just need to change the function's pattern. Easy enough!
![5 HTML5 APIs You Didn’t Know Existed]()
When you say or read "HTML5", you half expect exotic dancers and unicorns to walk into the room to the tune of "I'm Sexy and I Know It." Can you blame us though? We watched the fundamental APIs stagnate for so long that a basic feature...
![Write Better JavaScript with Promises]()
You've probably heard the talk around the water cooler about how promises are the future. All of the cool kids are using them, but you don't see what makes them so special. Can't you just use a callback? What's the big deal? In this article, we'll...
![CSS content and attr]()
CSS is becoming more and more powerful but in the sense that it allows us to do the little things easily. There have been larger features added like transitions, animations, and transforms, but one feature that goes under the radar is generated content. You saw a...
![GitHub-Style Sliding Links]()
GitHub seems to change a lot but not really change at all, if that makes any sense; the updates come often but are always fairly small. I spotted one of the most recent updates on the pull request page. Links to long branch...
I like the approach — instead of matching a word boundary e.g. ^[a-zA-z0-9]*$ you match the first invalid character. I wonder what the speed difference is…
BTW, you can use [^\w\d] insead ;) It’s lazier
My bad. You cant use \w since it matches _ as well. On the other hand \w handles \d, so if you are looking for something quick for chars, digits and _ — you can use \w.
You could also use PHP’s ctype_alnum to match only alphanumeric characters
which matches (ever so slightly) faster than its equivalent regular expression,
and still retain future flexibility by using something like:
Of course the speed difference is on the order of nanoseconds,
but it is faster nonetheless.
A better method name would be useful. ;)
@Jeff: Ooops. I have this function within a class. I actually use it like this:
I simply didn’t rename it for the blog. I’ll do that quick!
A word of warning,
ereg
is being removed in PHP6 because of the more powerful and usually fasterpreg
. Altering your code to work withpregs
is easy and safer should the server you’re on upgrade to PHP6 sometime in the future:ereg will be deprecated in php 5.3 and removed in 6, use preg instead
ereg is not available in php 5.3.0
any alternative for this ?
I’m rather new to regexp, and am just trying to get something exactly like this to work, but it just isn’t. I got annoyed, and then simplified as much as possible to this:
and it isn’t responding anything except 0, no matter what I try.
Oops sorry. Anyways, it’s just a text input that posts to itself, and it deals with the post by doing
The Best way I recommend is this :-