Unicode JavaScript Variables and Functions
We all get a kick out of unicode symbols, as we all saw in my Unicode CSS Classes post, and just as we can use them for CSS classes, we can use them for JavaScript variables and functions as well! Let's say you want to shave a few bytes of post-minified JavaScript byes by setting false equal to a variable. Why not do so by using a unicode variable?
var ಠ_ಠ = false;
if(someVar === ಠ_ಠ) { // If someVar is false...
// ...
}
Hilarious. The evil eyes signal a negative result. What about saving a few byes on true? The Beatles once said that "All You Need is Love", so let's use a heart:
var ❤ = true;
if(someVar === ❤) {
// ...
}
You can do the same with function names. Functions can be named after unicode symbols:
function ಠ(arg) {
// ...
}
Of course all of this is a bit ... insane, and you should never use unicode symbols, but nonetheless it's possible. Imagine starting a new job and seeing those symbols as meaningful variables -- you'd quit immediately! Hilarious!
![Camera and Video Control with HTML5]()
Client-side APIs on mobile and desktop devices are quickly providing the same APIs. Of course our mobile devices got access to some of these APIs first, but those APIs are slowly making their way to the desktop. One of those APIs is the getUserMedia API...
![Responsive Images: The Ultimate Guide]()
Chances are that any Web designers using our Ghostlab browser testing app, which allows seamless testing across all devices simultaneously, will have worked with responsive design in some shape or form. And as today's websites and devices become ever more varied, a plethora of responsive images...
![Create a Simple Slideshow Using MooTools, Part II: Controls and Events]()
Last week we created a very simple MooTools slideshow script. The script was very primitive: no events and no next/previous controls -- just cross-fading between images. This tutorial will take the previous slideshow script a step further by:
Adding "Next" and "Previous" controls.
Adding...
![dwImageProtector Plugin for jQuery]()
I've always been curious about the jQuery JavaScript library. jQuery has captured the hearts of web designers and developers everywhere and I've always wondered why. I've been told it's easy, which is probably why designers were so quick to adopt it NOT that designers...
I could see this improving minification when processing files with many variables/methods in the same scope (if they don’t use it already, I’m not sure).
Unicode characters are useless for minification, each unicode character uses 2 bytes instead of 1 in utf8. Also, there is no reason not to use unicode in variable names if you properly declare encoding in your html.
Actually, some characters take up to 4 bytes, not just 2. The Kannada letter TTHA in the example rakes 3 bytes for example, so “false” was minified from 5 bytes to 7 :P
lol, it’s a funny joke. but I think it may be realize if some protocol is developed in the future. so cool!