Retrieving requestAnimationFrame with JavaScript
The requestAnimationFrame function has been a major boost to developers creating and managing animations with JavaScript. Paul Irish has an excellent introduction on requestAnimationFrame -- I highly recommend you read it. This HTML5Hub post is also very good. Most browsers now support the animation function but in the case a browser doesn't, you can shim a rough equivalent with setInterval:
var requestAnimationFrame = window.requestAnimationFrame
|| window.webkitRequestAnimationFrame
|| window.mozRequestAnimationFrame
|| window.msRequestAnimationFrame
|| function(callback) { return setTimeout(callback, 1000 / 60); };
requestAnimationFrame was implemented with browser prefixes so we'll check for those if the unprefixed window method isn't there. If no native implementation exists, a setInterval shim will have to do!
![CSS vs. JS Animation: Which is Faster?]()
How is it possible that JavaScript-based animation has secretly always been as fast — or faster — than CSS transitions? And, how is it possible that Adobe and Google consistently release media-rich mobile sites that rival the performance of native apps?
This article serves as a point-by-point...
![JavaScript Promise API]()
While synchronous code is easier to follow and debug, async is generally better for performance and flexibility. Why "hold up the show" when you can trigger numerous requests at once and then handle them when each is ready? Promises are becoming a big part of the JavaScript world...
![Morphing Elements Using MooTools and CSS]()
Morphing an element between CSS classes is another great trick the MooTools JavaScript library enables you to do. Morphing isn't the most practical use of MooTools, but it's still a trick at your disposal.
Step 1: The XHTML
The block of content that will change is...
![MooTools Flashlight Effect]()
Another reason that I love Twitter so much is that I'm able to check out what fellow developers think is interesting. Chris Coyier posted about a flashlight effect he found built with jQuery. While I agree with Chris that it's a little corny, it...
According to caniuse, Microsoft’s browsers never had a vendor prefixed version of
requestAnimationFrame, so we can just keepmozandwebkit.That’s a very common way to normalize the function, but in most recent implementations
requestAnimationFramepasses an argument to the callback function, which is the amount of milliseconds sinceperformance.timing.navigationStart, with micro precision too. This can be very handy for the callback.It’s not really possible to perfectly emulate this, but you can get something close if you take note of the epoch time as soon as the script is executed. So this is how I used to polyfill
requestAnimationFrame:(function(start) { window.requestAnimationFrame = function(callback) { return setInterval(function() { callback(new Date().getTime() - start); }, 1000 / 60); }; })(new Date().getTime());(Well, not exactly… since most of the times
requestAnimationFrameis called again in the callback function, but the function itself takes some milliseconds at least to be executed – because it probably involves some kind of repaint – and you should adjust the time interval accordingly, or you may never hope to even get close to 60 fps.)Also, don’t forget to normalize
cancelAnimationFrame, which has a nasty variant in some (and maybe forgotten?) WebKit browsers:webkitCancelRequestAnimationFrame.