Implementing an Array.count() Method in JavaScript
As much as I write about MooTools on my blog, I spend most of my work day knee-deep in PHP. As you probably know, one way to get the size of an array in PHP is to use the count() function:
echo count($my_array);
In JavaScript, the way to get the size of an array is to use the length property, like this:
alert(my_array.length);
For some reason, I absolutely hate the ".length" way of retrieving the length of an array. For this reason, I've implement the count() method into JavaScript:
Array.prototype.count = function() {
return this.length;
};
The count() habit is difficult to break, so why try?
![Animating CSS3 Transforms with MooTools Fx]()
![Convert XML to JSON with JavaScript]()
If you follow me on Twitter, you know that I've been working on a super top secret mobile application using Appcelerator Titanium. The experience has been great: using JavaScript to create easy to write, easy to test, native mobile apps has been fun. My...
![MooTools 1.3 Browser Object]()
MooTools 1.3 was just released and one of the big additions is the Browser object. The Browser object is very helpful in that not only do you get information about browser type and browser versions, you can gain information about the user's OS, browser plugins, and...
![Submit Button Enabling]()
"Enabling" you ask? Yes. We all know how to disable the submit upon form submission and the reasons for doing so, but what about re-enabling the submit button after an allotted amount of time. After all, what if the user presses the "stop"...
Thanks for your blog. you offer great advice and tutorials and for some odd reason, if I am looking to see how to complete a task, you have a tutorial on it or at least an idea on the concept I am trying to achieve; so thanks David. Although this post came about 2 days too late. :)
Do you do this for strings as well?
@Binny: No, I don’t. Just arrays.
This is all fine and well, but length is fundamentally different from count.
Take the following example:
var myArray = [‘one’, ‘two’, ‘three’];
// myArray.length == 3, as we would expect
var myOtherArray[100] = ‘one’;
//myArray.length == 100, NOT 1
Even though we only have 1 item in the array, ‘length’ refers to the largest index + 1. Unlike PHP where we can use numeric keys and strings for indexes in an ad hoc way and still get an accurate count via count(), in JS it’s not quite the same.
In a way, this is just splitting hairs, but a lot of people already don’t understand JS’s length property, and referring to it as “count” only serves to further the confusion.
Correction to my previous post:
the second code snippet would be:
var myOtherArray = [];
myOtherArray[100] = ‘one’;
and its length property would actually return 101.
That’s right and that’s what I was expecting when searching for count on js. This should do it:
Riv, thats a much better form of the count use. Its surprising that this is not built into javascript.
I think it’s okay for personal project but it has a counter side when you are in enterprise. The maintainability is harder when people use custom extension (prototype existing framework object). It cane be confusing. In some case, I have seen people creating function to simply get an object inside an array. I think this should be used with parsimony. But, it’s just my opinion…
This is a working one. It counts function elements too.
I’ve just bumped into learning Js, I try to be as attentive as possible but, I don’t find a way. So, may any one help me how to understand Js programming.
OR
Wow, no functionality to edit comments? What is this, the year 2001?
Querying the length is faster than invoking a method, but the habit of using
.count()
is interesting.In python is used
len([1, 2, 3])
function to get the count, so the JavaScript’s length is not so bad :).