Disable the User’s JavaScript Console

By  on  

There are a few giant companies out there, namely Facebook and Netflix, who have decided to effectively disable a user's ability to execute JavaScript console commands.  The decision was initially made by Facebook to prevent users from executing a specific set of commands which would expose user information via the JavaScript console (the message was sent to all Facebook users via a massive SPAM message).  Of course this has been subject to loads of criticism, but before I weigh in, here's the code to do it:

// It appears Netflix is following (Facebook's lead)[https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7222129].

(function() {
    try {
        var $_console$$ = console;
        Object.defineProperty(window, "console", {
            get: function() {
                if ($_console$$._commandLineAPI)
                    throw "Sorry, for security reasons, the script console is deactivated on netflix.com";
                return $_console$$
            set: function($val$$) {
                $_console$$ = $val$$
    } catch ($ignore$$) {

Not that my opinion matters much, but I actually think this practice somewhat legit.  From their perspective, if disabling the consoles helps to temporarily prevent an issue, you have to do it.  In the long term, it's really not a good idea; they may become a target simply based on their effort to block people out.  Regardless, this code seems to work so if you want to prevent console executions, this will do it.

Recent Features

  • By
    CSS @supports

    Feature detection via JavaScript is a client side best practice and for all the right reasons, but unfortunately that same functionality hasn't been available within CSS.  What we end up doing is repeating the same properties multiple times with each browser prefix.  Yuck.  Another thing we...

  • By
    Create Namespaced Classes with MooTools

    MooTools has always gotten a bit of grief for not inherently using and standardizing namespaced-based JavaScript classes like the Dojo Toolkit does.  Many developers create their classes as globals which is generally frowned up.  I mostly disagree with that stance, but each to their own.  In any event...

Incredible Demos

  • By
    PHP IMDB Scraper

    It's been quite a while since I've written a PHP grabber and the itch finally got to me. This time the victim is the International Movie Database, otherwise known as IMDB. IMDB has info on every movie ever made (or so it seems). Their...

  • By
    Using Opacity to Show Focus with MooTools

    I'm a huge fan of using subtle effects like link nudging (jQuery, MooTools) to enhance the user experience and increase the perceived dynamism of my websites. Trust me -- a lot of little things are what take websites to the next level.


  1. I’m sure you can still get around this by injecting your own node but I can fully understand this practice.

  2. gregg

    why all the $_$$ in your variable names?

  3. Untitled
    javascript:window.console2 = (function () {
    var globals = [],
    iframe = document.createElement(‘iframe’),
    iframe.src = ‘about:blank’;
    iframe.style.display = ‘none’;
    return (iframe.contentWindow || iframe.contentDocument).console;
    Object.defineProperty(window, “console”, {
    get: function () { return window.console2; }

    s/var/window sorry :)

  4. Asmor

    I had no idea that Object.defineProperty was even a thing. That’s awesome!

    @gregg: Presumably to avoid namespacing issues, although that’s kind of stupid since this code is already in a closure.

  5. Can’t a developer set a breakpoint and step over/ shortcut this?

    • TJ

      Yes. This is why doing anything for security reasons in javascript is a waste of time, especially if it makes it harder to maintain the code.

    • Yeah, but this is just to prevent non-developers from pasting malicious JS into their own browser consoles.

    • But what if the code is uglified?

    • Why would you uglify it?

    • Jessy Cormier

      Why wouldn’t you uglify live code…?

  6. You have made a good point here David, especially in the wake of people not taking this blocking too kindly. My reservation is this. If you’re blocking anything, do it tastefully. If you open up the console on FB and try to type something, you ll immediately see an ugly message that roughly translates to ‘Get lost’. They could ve easily done some mumbo jumbo that informs the person nicely about the block and made some JS Object variable available to experiment their site with. Khan Academy does something similar (they dont block the usage of console) but they do encourage you take a look at their KA object.

    The physical address of the Facebook offices is 1 Hacker Way. So make some way for the hackers on your site!

    • randomlygeneratedname

      why do you want to open up the console in facebook anyway?

  7. rud

    let the cat and mouse chase begin !

  8. Jeff K

    If you open up the console in Facebook they provide a link. From there they let you enable it.

  9. I can understand their perspective to some degree…great post David, very interesting!

  10. suprsidr

    firebug console still works on both.

  11. Gerson Goulart

    I think Facebook (and Netflix) are not trying to prevent knowledgeable people to look into their website’s code. The point is to prevent people with no knowledge to harm themselves by following a hacker steps in a scam (Self XSS).

    If you know how to circumvent the block (with a solution such as “Untitled” posted here), or if you know how to install Firebug, than you do have way more than enough knowledge to use all the power of the console in a manner that is safe for yourself. It’s not likely that any corporation would even bother to prevent you to do that.

Wrap your code in <pre class="{language}"></pre> tags, link to a GitHub gist, JSFiddle fiddle, or CodePen pen to embed!