Prototype’s Element.on with MooTools
Prototype 1.7RC1 was released on Monday. While the big news with this release appears to be the implementation of John Resig's Sizzle selector engine, what caught my eye was the new on method. This new Element.on method is very similar to Prototype's Element.observe method but with a few enhancements (event relaying, event stop). While I don't necessarily care about the enhancements, I simply love that the event method is called "on." Using "on" as the method name makes it sound more like the event itself. Here's how easy it is to use "on" instead of "addEvent" for your events.
The MooTools JavaScript
/* the directive */
Element.alias('addEvent','on');
/* the usage */
$('myElement').on('click',fn);
Using on instead of addEvent is as easy as a quick MooTools Element.alias directive.
It's weird that I like "on" so much considering a generally don't like jQuery's css and attr methods. Oh well. Congrats to the Prototype team for their impending release.
![5 Awesome New Mozilla Technologies You’ve Never Heard Of]()
My trip to Mozilla Summit 2013 was incredible. I've spent so much time focusing on my project that I had lost sight of all of the great work Mozillians were putting out. MozSummit provided the perfect reminder of how brilliant my colleagues are and how much...
![fetch API]()
One of the worst kept secrets about AJAX on the web is that the underlying API for it, XMLHttpRequest, wasn't really made for what we've been using it for. We've done well to create elegant APIs around XHR but we know we can do better. Our effort to...
![Reverse Element Order with CSS Flexbox]()
CSS is becoming more and more powerful these days, almost to the point where the order of HTML elements output to the page no longer matters from a display standpoint -- CSS lets you do so much that almost any layout, large or small, is possible. Semantics...
![Adding Events to Adding Events in MooTools]()
Note: This post has been updated.
One of my huge web peeves is when an element has click events attached to it but the element doesn't sport the "pointer" cursor. I mean how the hell is the user supposed to know they can/should click on...
Hi David. Nice idea. I like also css() and other jQuery methods’ name (for their simplicity), but I prefer Mootools core. So, why not:
Element.alias('addEvent','on'); Element.implement({ 'css': function(p, v) { if (v == undefined) return this.getStyle(p); else return this.setStyle(p, v); }, 'attr': function(a, v) { if (v == undefined) return this.getProperty(a); else return this.setProperty(a, v); }, 'html': function(h) { if (h == undefined) return this.get('html'); else return this.set('html', h); });What do you think?
@Lorenzo S.: I’ve done posts like that in the past. I can’t stand .css and .attr for MooTools, but what you have would work.
@Lorenzo S.: If you want jQuery syntax in MooTools, have a look at this repository: http://github.com/cheeaun/mooj/blob/master/mooj.js
@David
Fully agree with “on” seems acceptable, whereas .css, .attr etc. doesn’t :)
I guess the reason you might like “on” – when not other jQuery shortcuts – might be due to we’re used to “on” in “onClick” etc. for regular JavaScript, which probably makes the mind having positive thoughts.
Great advice, thanks a lot.
However, how much slower will this be? I mean, will on() trigger addEvent() and that in turn will trigger whatever internal functions are used?