Elegant Selects with Quick[select]

By  on  

Form elements have always allowed limited styling...which is why I hate working on form display.  And I started when form elements were virtually unstylable back in the Internet Explorer 4 days.  Of course we've come a long way but there's one element which is still somewhat difficult to style and isn't particularly elegant:  SELECT.  The element looks different from OS to OS and sometimes even browser to browser -- not ideal.

I recently found an awesome jQuery plugin to make the SELECT element more presentable, elegant, and stylable:  Quick[select].  Quick[select] turns SELECT options into clickable buttons with a traditional SELECT as a fallback.

The CSS

Quick[select] comes with a base stylesheet but you can style the option "buttons" in any way you'd like, as you can see in my demo.  Here are my basic styles:

.btn-group .btn {
	border: 1px solid #ccc;
	background: #eee;
	padding: 4px;
	border-radius: 4px;
	margin: 0 10px 0 0;
	font-size: 14px;
	display: inline;

	transition: background .3s, border-color .3s;
}
.btn-group .btn.active {
	background: #7ac9ed;
	border-color: #0c7bb6;
}

Quick[select] also has a helper for bootstrapped-driven sites, if that's your stack.

The JavaScript

Using Quick[select] is easy:  add the plugin to the page and then use the jQuery plugin syntax to create instances for given SELECT elements:

jQuery('#wakeup-time').quickselect({
	activeButtonClass: 'btn-primary active',
	breakOutValues: ['06:30', '07:00', '07:30', '08:00'],
	buttonClass: 'btn btn-default',
	selectDefaultText: 'Other',
	wrapperClass: 'btn-group'
});

The most important option is breakOutValues which generates clickable buttons for popular choices (specified by you) within the SELECT element.  You'll also want to set a custom selectDefaultText value for when the button which triggers the full display of the options.

Quick[select] is the best SELECT alternative that I've seen in a long time.  This plugin allows for elegant, stylish, and usable SELECT elements.  Go check it out and do your users a favor!

Recent Features

  • By
    CSS vs. JS Animation: Which is Faster?

    How is it possible that JavaScript-based animation has secretly always been as fast — or faster — than CSS transitions? And, how is it possible that Adobe and Google consistently release media-rich mobile sites that rival the performance of native apps? This article serves as a point-by-point...

  • By
    JavaScript Promise API

    While synchronous code is easier to follow and debug, async is generally better for performance and flexibility. Why "hold up the show" when you can trigger numerous requests at once and then handle them when each is ready?  Promises are becoming a big part of the JavaScript world...

Incredible Demos

  • By
    Rotate Elements with CSS Transformations

    I've gone on a million rants about the lack of progress with CSS and how I'm happy that both JavaScript and browser-specific CSS have tried to push web design forward. One of those browser-specific CSS properties we love is CSS transformations. CSS transformations...

  • By
    Using jQuery and MooTools Together

    There's yet another reason to master more than one JavaScript library: you can use some of them together! Since MooTools is prototype-based and jQuery is not, jQuery and MooTools may be used together on the same page. The XHTML and JavaScript jQuery is namespaced so the...

Discussion

  1. Hi David. Thanks for highlighting my plugin!

  2. MaxArt

    This is a nice alternative way to display multiple options, but if a classic combo is needed I’d rely on the CSS appearance property, and fall back to the unstyled element for those browsers that don’t support it (hint: you can even use @supports in this case).

Wrap your code in <pre class="{language}"></pre> tags, link to a GitHub gist, JSFiddle fiddle, or CodePen pen to embed!