Immediately Executing Functions
JavaScript is full of nifty little tricks to accomplish tasks with less code. One of those tricks is immediately executing functions. We oftentimes see this pattern for executing anonymous functions to limit variable scope:
(function() {
console.log('executed!');
// Do processing here
})();
What many developers don't know is that this code can be shorted by using a ! before the anonymous function:
!function() {
console.log('executed!');
// Do processing here
}()
The function above executes immediately, just as the first snippet did. One caveat: the immediately executing function always returns false. If you desire the result of the anonymous function, you wont want to use this second pattern.
Ben Alman has created an excellent, detailed writeup on the subject and if you want to learn more, be sure to visit his post!
![JavaScript Promise API]()
While synchronous code is easier to follow and debug, async is generally better for performance and flexibility. Why "hold up the show" when you can trigger numerous requests at once and then handle them when each is ready? Promises are becoming a big part of the JavaScript world...
![Introducing MooTools Templated]()
One major problem with creating UI components with the MooTools JavaScript framework is that there isn't a great way of allowing customization of template and ease of node creation. As of today, there are two ways of creating:
new Element Madness
The first way to create UI-driven...
![Unicode CSS Classes]()
CSS class name structure and consistency is really important; some developers camelcase classnames, others use dashes, and others use underscores. One thing I've learned when toying around by HTML and CSS class names is that you can actually use unicode symbols and icons as classnames.
![Form Element AJAX Spinner Attachment Using MooTools]()
Many times you'll see a form dynamically change available values based on the value of a form field. For example, a "State" field will change based on which Country a user selects. What annoys me about these forms is that they'll often do an...
Because not quite enough people pulled out their hair on encountering the function(){…}() syntax.
The first is not exactly valid. The right call has the call-parentheses inside the container parentheses.
(function() { ... code ... }())I think the ! is works with call-parentheses too. So it’s not shorter.
> !function(){console.log('asd')} false > !function(){console.log('asd')}() asd true > function(){console.log('asd')}() asd undefined > (function(){console.log('asd')}()) asd undefined >I think such oddities should be removed from the language.
What would ever be the argument for doing this? A Obfuscated Javascript Code Contest?
Why even use such a function? I don’t get it. If you want code to execute immediatly, just write it outside a ‘function’. What’s the point of an anonymous function you can’t call later on for reusability? Or am I missing something?
Encapsulation of vars…