Get Element Dimensions After CSS Transform

By  on  

I've been playing a lot with meta viewports recently due to seeing many HTML5 TV apps coded explicitly for 1280x720 which you'll see on many HD televisions.  We all know that it's a much better practice to use responsive design than hardcode dimensions but, that aside, meta viewports are meant to do the scaling.  So it's CSS transforms, specifically scale(), to the rescue.

In creating a meta viewport shim, I needed to calculate an element's dimensions after it had been scaled.  Properties like clientWidth and innerWidth will return the element's original width, ignoring the transform.  To get the scaled size you must use getBoundingClientRect:

var originalWidth = myElement.innerWidth; // 1280
var originalHeight = myElement.innerHeight; // 720

originalElement.style.transform = 'scale(1.5)';

console.log(originalElement.getBoundingClientRect());

/*
ClientRect {
  bottom: 1080
  height: 1080
  left: 0
  right: 1920
  top: 0
  width: 1920
}
*/

The example above sets the scale and returns different desired height and width dimensions based on the scale.  getBoundingClientRect returns more than just height and width by position coordinates as well.

I was worried I wouldn't be able to accomplish this feat but getBoundingClientRect was the perfect solution!

Recent Features

  • By
    CSS Animations Between Media Queries

    CSS animations are right up there with sliced bread. CSS animations are efficient because they can be hardware accelerated, they require no JavaScript overhead, and they are composed of very little CSS code. Quite often we add CSS transforms to elements via CSS during...

  • By
    CSS vs. JS Animation: Which is Faster?

    How is it possible that JavaScript-based animation has secretly always been as fast — or faster — than CSS transitions? And, how is it possible that Adobe and Google consistently release media-rich mobile sites that rival the performance of native apps? This article serves as a point-by-point...

Incredible Demos

  • By
    Select Dropdowns, MooTools, and CSS Print

    I know I've harped on this over and over again but it's important to enhance pages for print. You can do some things using simple CSS but today's post features MooTools and jQuery. We'll be taking the options of a SELECT element and generating...

  • By
    Image Manipulation with PHP and the GD Library

    Yeah, I'm a Photoshop wizard. I rock the selection tool. I crop like a farmer. I dominate the bucket tool. Hell, I even went as far as wielding the wizard wand selection tool once. ...OK I'm rubbish when it comes to Photoshop.

Discussion

  1. Hello, David,

    I want to remind you, that only Gecko is adding height and width as can be read in the note at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/getBoundingClientRect#Return_value.

    Compare it to MSDN: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms536433%28VS.85%29.aspx

    So your solution is not cross-browser-compatible.

    I’d look for whether jQuery can solve it and then inspect their solution ;-)

  2. This is a good solution but it has limited application. I guess we need to work a bit more on looking for answers that may be applied to multiple scenarios instead of specific ones.

  3. Dan

    This might be a very simple question but wondered if you could help.

    Is it possible to calculate the scale factor based on the height and width of an element, I think its the math I’m struggling with.

    If I know my element is 1280 x 720 to begin with …

    … and after scaling the element I know the dimensions are: 1920 x 1080

    How do I calculate the scale (1.5)?

  4. Ben

    Dan, it’s just “1920 / 1280 = 1.5”, or “1080 / 720 = 1.5”. The scale is just the ratio between the height of one to the height of the other, or the width of one to the width of the other.

Wrap your code in <pre class="{language}"></pre> tags, link to a GitHub gist, JSFiddle fiddle, or CodePen pen to embed!