Get Element Dimensions After CSS Transform

By  on  

I've been playing a lot with meta viewports recently due to seeing many HTML5 TV apps coded explicitly for 1280x720 which you'll see on many HD televisions.  We all know that it's a much better practice to use responsive design than hardcode dimensions but, that aside, meta viewports are meant to do the scaling.  So it's CSS transforms, specifically scale(), to the rescue.

In creating a meta viewport shim, I needed to calculate an element's dimensions after it had been scaled.  Properties like clientWidth and innerWidth will return the element's original width, ignoring the transform.  To get the scaled size you must use getBoundingClientRect:

var originalWidth = myElement.innerWidth; // 1280
var originalHeight = myElement.innerHeight; // 720

originalElement.style.transform = 'scale(1.5)';

console.log(originalElement.getBoundingClientRect());

/*
ClientRect {
  bottom: 1080
  height: 1080
  left: 0
  right: 1920
  top: 0
  width: 1920
}
*/

The example above sets the scale and returns different desired height and width dimensions based on the scale.  getBoundingClientRect returns more than just height and width by position coordinates as well.

I was worried I wouldn't be able to accomplish this feat but getBoundingClientRect was the perfect solution!

Recent Features

  • By
    CSS vs. JS Animation: Which is Faster?

    How is it possible that JavaScript-based animation has secretly always been as fast — or faster — than CSS transitions? And, how is it possible that Adobe and Google consistently release media-rich mobile sites that rival the performance of native apps? This article serves as a point-by-point...

  • By
    An Interview with Eric Meyer

    Your early CSS books were instrumental in pushing my love for front end technologies. What was it about CSS that you fell in love with and drove you to write about it? At first blush, it was the simplicity of it as compared to the table-and-spacer...

Incredible Demos

  • By
    Sexy Opacity Animation with MooTools or jQuery

    A big part of the sexiness that is Apple software is Apple's use of opacity. Like seemingly every other Apple user interface technique, it needs to be ported to the web (</fanboy>). I've put together an example of a sexy opacity animation technique...

  • By
    CSS Tooltips

    We all know that you can make shapes with CSS and a single HTML element, as I've covered in my CSS Triangles and CSS Circles posts.  Triangles and circles are fairly simply though, so as CSS advances, we need to stretch the boundaries...

Discussion

  1. Hello, David,

    I want to remind you, that only Gecko is adding height and width as can be read in the note at https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Element/getBoundingClientRect#Return_value.

    Compare it to MSDN: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms536433%28VS.85%29.aspx

    So your solution is not cross-browser-compatible.

    I’d look for whether jQuery can solve it and then inspect their solution ;-)

  2. This is a good solution but it has limited application. I guess we need to work a bit more on looking for answers that may be applied to multiple scenarios instead of specific ones.

  3. Dan

    This might be a very simple question but wondered if you could help.

    Is it possible to calculate the scale factor based on the height and width of an element, I think its the math I’m struggling with.

    If I know my element is 1280 x 720 to begin with …

    … and after scaling the element I know the dimensions are: 1920 x 1080

    How do I calculate the scale (1.5)?

  4. Ben

    Dan, it’s just “1920 / 1280 = 1.5”, or “1080 / 720 = 1.5”. The scale is just the ratio between the height of one to the height of the other, or the width of one to the width of the other.

Wrap your code in <pre class="{language}"></pre> tags, link to a GitHub gist, JSFiddle fiddle, or CodePen pen to embed!