The Truth About Code Review
Code review is an essential practice for organizations that cater to large amounts of traffic and want to ensure maintainability throughout a team of developers. Of course that doesn't mean that every developer on the team thinks and codes the same way, so code review (in many cases) is in place to ensure that the code has no loose ends or security holes. If there was ever an accurate illustration of code review, this would be it:
No one is ever completely satisfied with each piece, but as long as there's nothing insecure or dysfunctional, it's usually best to let it pass.
Image source: http://commadot.com/
![Page Visibility API]()
One event that's always been lacking within the document is a signal for when the user is looking at a given tab, or another tab. When does the user switch off our site to look at something else? When do they come back?
![JavaScript Promise API]()
While synchronous code is easier to follow and debug, async is generally better for performance and flexibility. Why "hold up the show" when you can trigger numerous requests at once and then handle them when each is ready? Promises are becoming a big part of the JavaScript world...
![Create a Simple Slideshow Using MooTools, Part III: Creating a Class]()
![Build a Toggling Announcement Slider Using MooTools 1.2]()
A few of my customer have asked for me to create a subtle but dynamic (...I know...) way for them to advertise different specials on their website. Not something that would display on every page, but periodically or only the homepage. Using a trick...
So true!! lol
I would add comprehensible/maintanable to the requirement to let it pass.
LOL. This is incredibly funny, and incredibly true!
I actually like this version more. :-)
http://www.osnews.com/images/comics/wtfm.jpg
Heh, good stuff!
LOL i saw this for the first time on the book http://www.amazon.com/Clean-Code-Handbook-Software-Craftsmanship/dp/0132350882. I was reading in the beach and start laughing by my self. Weird!