Replace Content in PRE Tags with HTML Entities
If you have a website that relies heavily on PRE tags, you know the important of converting PRE tag content to their HTML entities. Doing so prevents worlds of possible rendering issues. The following PHP snippet HTML-Entitizes (?) any code within PRE tags:
//replaces pre content with html entities
function pre_entities($matches) {
return str_replace($matches[1],htmlentities($matches[1]),$matches[0]);
}
//to html entities; assume content is in the "content" variable
$content = preg_replace_callback('/<pre.*?>(.*?)<\/pre>/imsu',pre_entities, $content);
I use this for just about every post I write. You could also stick this in your CMS if you have clients that may have use for PRE tags.
![5 Awesome New Mozilla Technologies You’ve Never Heard Of]()
My trip to Mozilla Summit 2013 was incredible. I've spent so much time focusing on my project that I had lost sight of all of the great work Mozillians were putting out. MozSummit provided the perfect reminder of how brilliant my colleagues are and how much...
![Create a Sheen Logo Effect with CSS]()
I was inspired when I first saw Addy Osmani's original ShineTime blog post. The hover sheen effect is simple but awesome. When I started my blog redesign, I really wanted to use a sheen effect with my logo. Using two HTML elements and...
![Facebook Sliders With Mootools and CSS]()
One of the great parts of being a developer that uses Facebook is that I can get some great ideas for progressive website enhancement. Facebook incorporates many advanced JavaScript and AJAX features: photo loads by left and right arrow, dropdown menus, modal windows, and...
![JavaScript Battery API]()
Mozilla Aurora 11 was recently released with a bevy of new features. One of those great new features is their initial implementation of the Battery Status API. This simple API provides you information about the battery's current charge level, its...
Beware that having someting like “something” in another would leave you with one opening and two closings. If this is a possible usecase, you might use a regex like this :
/(.*?[.*]*)/imsu
…but it still wouldn’t handle the case of having a single closing tag inside another . Could someone manage to write a regex which would handle this case ?
The function name (pre_entities) should be between quotes otherwise it will throw a notice.
Beware that having a pre tag inside another pre tag would leave you with one pre opening and two pre closings. If this is a possible usecase, you might use a regex like this :
/<pre.*?>(.*?[<pre.*?>.*<\/pre>]*)<\/pre>/imsu
The tags got stripped in my first comment, sorry about that, if htmlentities show up in the regex, replace them with the good characters …but it still wouldn’t handle the case of having a single closing pre tag inside another pre. Could someone manage to write a regex which would handle this case ?
The function name (pre_entities) should be between quotes otherwise it will throw a notice.
It works as long as you don’t have nested <pre> tags.
I wrote about this on my blog but the only real way to do it is to use an XML parser.
One issue to watch out for is to not encode any of the content before this is run, as it will double-entitize the ampersand e.g., &.
Also, would there be any issues if not matches are found?
To solve the nested ‘pre’ tag issue, just use some non-standard tags that you’re sure won’t be in your content, rather than ‘pre’ (i.e. ‘mycode’). Your regular expression then becomes a match for the ‘mycode’ tags, and you can immediately follow it up with another preg_replace () to turn the ‘mycode’ tags into ‘pre’ tags after you’re done htmlentitizing the content.
I’ve been using elliotswan.com/postable. It seems to get the job done for me. But it’s nice to know this option.
Could someone explain how to fix the following notice?
Notice: Use of undefined constant pre_entities – assumed ‘pre_entities’ in C:\wamp\www\example.com\admin\get_posts.php on line 16
doh! put quotes on ‘pre_entities’, fixes it. Thanks David! Great snippet.
Thank you for the tip! I couldn’t find what was going wrong with the HTML…