Extend Native Prototypes in Node.js

By  on  

As someone who was on the legendary MooTools JavaScript team, I have some affection for extending the prototypes of native objects.  Of course the practice of extending prototypes is taboo these days as browser vendors are iterating and implementing new specs more quickly than the IE6 era, but extending natives in Node.js could be considered safer as, in theory, we have more control over the environment (Node.js version).

Extending a native within Node.js is fairly simple:

// Inside a file module called "String.prototype.startsWith.js"
// Naming convention important for maintenance and clearness of intent

// This is a very, very simple shim not made for production use
// It's simply to illustrate the prototype extension
// More logic should be added for edge cases 
if(!String.prototype.startsWith) {
  String.prototype.startsWith = function(term) {
    return this.substr(0, term.length) === term;
  };
}

// ----------

// Inside any other module that wants to use the extension
require('String.prototype.startsWith');

// Usage
if(myString.startsWith('Moo')) {
  // ...
}

As long as you require the the module that contains the extension code, the native will have its desired additional method.  Of course this doesn't just apply to natives, you can extend other Objects in this same fashion.  If you scour npm you can find loads of prototype extensions, one being String.prototype.startsWith, which also work in client side code.

I presume I'll receive some haterade for suggesting this practice being more OK with Node.js so have at me!

Recent Features

  • By
    Interview with a Pornhub Web Developer

    Regardless of your stance on pornography, it would be impossible to deny the massive impact the adult website industry has had on pushing the web forward. From pushing the browser's video limits to pushing ads through WebSocket so ad blockers don't detect them, you have...

  • By
    CSS @supports

    Feature detection via JavaScript is a client side best practice and for all the right reasons, but unfortunately that same functionality hasn't been available within CSS.  What we end up doing is repeating the same properties multiple times with each browser prefix.  Yuck.  Another thing we...

Incredible Demos

  • By
    Create a CSS Cube

    CSS cubes really showcase what CSS has become over the years, evolving from simple color and dimension directives to a language capable of creating deep, creative visuals.  Add animation and you've got something really neat.  Unfortunately each CSS cube tutorial I've read is a bit...

  • By
    Sliding Labels Using MooTools

    A week back I saw a great effect created by CSSKarma: input labels being animated horizontally. The idea is everything positive: elegant, practical, unobtrusive, and requires very little jQuery code. Luckily the effect doesn't require much MooTools code either! The HTML A...

Discussion

  1. Ricardo

    In fact, I don’t see much problem extending String/Array/… objects in client side code. When the browser supports it, then the polyfill will not be used.
    About extending host objects (DOMElement…), the main problem was IE6-7. Recent browsers have no problem with it, even if that does not belong to the specification

  2. MaxArt

    Never had any problem extending native prototypes, but there are a few caveats:

    – you either polyfill standard methods (like startsWith above) or use names that won’t probably be used by future standard developments, such as vectorDotProduct;
    – don’t abuse this technique: changing prototypes is *slow* and also user-defined methods in the prototype chain are;
    – unless you make a module out of your extensions, remember that your code will be less reusable.

  3. “extending natives in Node.js” should “be considered safer as, in theory,” upgrading Node.js breaks everything :P

    Kidding, my v0.11 to v4 upgrade was actually pretty smooth.

Wrap your code in <pre class="{language}"></pre> tags, link to a GitHub gist, JSFiddle fiddle, or CodePen pen to embed!