Implement MooTools Element.getSiblings()
Update: I've added the "match" option to the getSiblings() method.
While browsing through the open tickets at the MooTools LightHouse, I found this little gem proposed by SixtyMonkey:
Element.implement({
getSiblings: function(match,nocache) {
return this.getParent().getChildren(match,nocache).erase(this);
}
});
The above code grabs all sibling elements (the collection of alike elements minus the "found" one.) Do you think this should be added to the core?
I submitted this to core and it has been accepted. Look forward to seeing this in core!
![7 Essential JavaScript Functions]()
I remember the early days of JavaScript where you needed a simple function for just about everything because the browser vendors implemented features differently, and not just edge features, basic features, like addEventListener and attachEvent. Times have changed but there are still a few functions each developer should...
![Conquering Impostor Syndrome]()
Two years ago I documented my struggles with Imposter Syndrome and the response was immense. I received messages of support and commiseration from new web developers, veteran engineers, and even persons of all experience levels in other professions. I've even caught myself reading the post...
![Create a Simple Slideshow Using MooTools]()
One excellent way to add dynamism to any website is to implement a slideshow featuring images or sliding content. Of course there are numerous slideshow plugins available but many of them can be overkill if you want to do simple slideshow without controls or events.
![Fancy FAQs with MooTools Sliders: Version 2]()
A little over a year ago I authored a post titled Fancy FAQs with MooTools Sliders. My post detailed a method of taking boring FAQs and making them more robust using the world's best JavaScript framework: MooTools. I've taken some time to...
hello david!
i was wondering when this method would becomes part of the core? in MooTools 2 perhaps? or would you guys do something like MooTools 1.2.4 or something?
It is – just not documented
little typo
nocash -> nocache