Implement MooTools Element.getSiblings()
Update: I've added the "match" option to the getSiblings() method.
While browsing through the open tickets at the MooTools LightHouse, I found this little gem proposed by SixtyMonkey:
Element.implement({
getSiblings: function(match,nocache) {
return this.getParent().getChildren(match,nocache).erase(this);
}
});
The above code grabs all sibling elements (the collection of alike elements minus the "found" one.) Do you think this should be added to the core?
I submitted this to core and it has been accepted. Look forward to seeing this in core!
![CSS Animations Between Media Queries]()
CSS animations are right up there with sliced bread. CSS animations are efficient because they can be hardware accelerated, they require no JavaScript overhead, and they are composed of very little CSS code. Quite often we add CSS transforms to elements via CSS during...
![Create Namespaced Classes with MooTools]()
MooTools has always gotten a bit of grief for not inherently using and standardizing namespaced-based JavaScript classes like the Dojo Toolkit does. Many developers create their classes as globals which is generally frowned up. I mostly disagree with that stance, but each to their own. In any event...
![9 Mind-Blowing WebGL Demos]()
As much as developers now loathe Flash, we're still playing a bit of catch up to natively duplicate the animation capabilities that Adobe's old technology provided us. Of course we have canvas, an awesome technology, one which I highlighted 9 mind-blowing demos. Another technology available...
![Multiple Background CSS Animations]()
CSS background animation has been a hot topic for a long time, mostly because they look pretty sweet and don't require additional elements. I was recently asked if it was possible to have multiple background animations on a given element and the answer is yes...with...
hello david!
i was wondering when this method would becomes part of the core? in MooTools 2 perhaps? or would you guys do something like MooTools 1.2.4 or something?
It is – just not documented
little typo
nocash -> nocache