When JavaScript Frameworks Collide

By  on  

Though their theories on JavaScript coding differ, JavaScript framework developers keep a tight lip when it comes to commenting on other frameworks. When another framework is brought up, the developer usually gives generic responses like "they're doing good work" or "they've got a unique approach." Anything outside of this response seems to gain unwanted attention, which is exactly what MooTools' Olmo did last week.

Here's the sequence of events that led to his eventual departure from MooTools:

  1. Olmo gave a presentation about MooTools in which he said some inflamatory comments about the jQuery framework and posted it on the official MooTools Blog. The blog post has been taken down but you can view the video below.
  2. jQuery developer John Resig wrote an article entitled I Learned Some Things About jQuery Today. The article was a sarcastic piece summarizing the offensive points of Olmo's presentation; it got quite a bit of attention.
  3. MooTools lead developer, Valerio, expelled Olmo from the project and wrote a very sincere apology on the MooTools blog. Read the comments -- they're quite interesting. Some parting shots were taken by Olmo toward another MooTools developer Aaron Newton.
  4. Olmo replied directly to John, apologizing for his comments.

Though Olmo's comments were interesting, they were also unfounded and irresponsible (from the mouths of John, Valerio, and Olmo himself). Check out he video for yourself.

Olmo's Presentation


LA Developers Meetup - OCT 7 - Olmo Maldonado from will jessup on Vimeo.

Prototype vs. MooTools vs. jQuery

Prototype team member Justin Palmer wrote an article about articles that compare the major JavaScript frameworks. This stirred up fury from the jQuery camp. MooTools developer Aaron Newton chimed in and unintentionally threw more fuel into the fire. Check out the article.

Recent Features

  • By
    CSS vs. JS Animation: Which is Faster?

    How is it possible that JavaScript-based animation has secretly always been as fast — or faster — than CSS transitions? And, how is it possible that Adobe and Google consistently release media-rich mobile sites that rival the performance of native apps? This article serves as a point-by-point...

  • By
    CSS Animations Between Media Queries

    CSS animations are right up there with sliced bread. CSS animations are efficient because they can be hardware accelerated, they require no JavaScript overhead, and they are composed of very little CSS code. Quite often we add CSS transforms to elements via CSS during...

Incredible Demos

  • By
    Do / Undo Functionality with MooTools

    We all know that do/undo functionality is a God send for word processing apps. I've used those terms so often that I think of JavaScript actions in terms of "do" an "undo." I've put together a proof of concept Do/Undo class with MooTools. The MooTools...

  • By
    Record Text Selections Using MooTools or jQuery AJAX

    One technique I'm seeing more and more these days (CNNSI.com, for example) is AJAX recording of selected text. It makes sense -- if you detect users selecting the terms over and over again, you can probably assume your visitors are searching that term on Google...

Discussion

    Wrap your code in <pre class="{language}"></pre> tags, link to a GitHub gist, JSFiddle fiddle, or CodePen pen to embed!