Immediately Executing Functions
JavaScript is full of nifty little tricks to accomplish tasks with less code. One of those tricks is immediately executing functions. We oftentimes see this pattern for executing anonymous functions to limit variable scope:
(function() {
console.log('executed!');
// Do processing here
})();
What many developers don't know is that this code can be shorted by using a ! before the anonymous function:
!function() {
console.log('executed!');
// Do processing here
}()
The function above executes immediately, just as the first snippet did. One caveat: the immediately executing function always returns false. If you desire the result of the anonymous function, you wont want to use this second pattern.
Ben Alman has created an excellent, detailed writeup on the subject and if you want to learn more, be sure to visit his post!
![5 Ways that CSS and JavaScript Interact That You May Not Know About]()
CSS and JavaScript: the lines seemingly get blurred by each browser release. They have always done a very different job but in the end they are both front-end technologies so they need do need to work closely. We have our .js files and our .css, but...
![Being a Dev Dad]()
I get asked loads of questions every day but I'm always surprised that they're rarely questions about code or even tech -- many of the questions I get are more about non-dev stuff like what my office is like, what software I use, and oftentimes...
![Pure CSS Slide Up and Slide Down]()
If I can avoid using JavaScript for element animations, I'm incredibly happy and driven to do so. They're more efficient, don't require a JavaScript framework to manage steps, and they're more elegant. One effect that is difficult to nail down with pure CSS is sliding up...
![dat.gui: Exceptional JavaScript Interface Controller]()
We all love trusted JavaScript frameworks like MooTools, jQuery, and Dojo, but there's a big push toward using focused micro-frameworks for smaller purposes. Of course, there are positives and negatives to using them. Positives include smaller JS footprint (especially good for mobile) and less cruft, negatives...
Because not quite enough people pulled out their hair on encountering the function(){…}() syntax.
The first is not exactly valid. The right call has the call-parentheses inside the container parentheses.
(function() { ... code ... }())I think the ! is works with call-parentheses too. So it’s not shorter.
> !function(){console.log('asd')} false > !function(){console.log('asd')}() asd true > function(){console.log('asd')}() asd undefined > (function(){console.log('asd')}()) asd undefined >I think such oddities should be removed from the language.
What would ever be the argument for doing this? A Obfuscated Javascript Code Contest?
Why even use such a function? I don’t get it. If you want code to execute immediatly, just write it outside a ‘function’. What’s the point of an anonymous function you can’t call later on for reusability? Or am I missing something?
Encapsulation of vars…