The Truth About Code Review
Code review is an essential practice for organizations that cater to large amounts of traffic and want to ensure maintainability throughout a team of developers. Of course that doesn't mean that every developer on the team thinks and codes the same way, so code review (in many cases) is in place to ensure that the code has no loose ends or security holes. If there was ever an accurate illustration of code review, this would be it:
No one is ever completely satisfied with each piece, but as long as there's nothing insecure or dysfunctional, it's usually best to let it pass.
Image source: http://commadot.com/
You've probably heard the talk around the water cooler about how promises are the future. All of the cool kids are using them, but you don't see what makes them so special. Can't you just use a callback? What's the big deal? In this article, we'll...
MooTools has always gotten a bit of grief for not inherently using and standardizing namespaced-based JavaScript classes like the Dojo Toolkit does. Many developers create their classes as globals which is generally frowned up. I mostly disagree with that stance, but each to their own. In any event...
Chris Coyier's CSS-Tricks blog is everything mine isn't. Chris' blog is rock star popular, mine is not. Chris prefers jQuery, I prefer MooTools. Chris does posts with practical solutions, I do posts about stupid video-game like effects. If I...
So true!! lol
I would add comprehensible/maintanable to the requirement to let it pass.
LOL. This is incredibly funny, and incredibly true!
I actually like this version more. :-)
http://www.osnews.com/images/comics/wtfm.jpg
Heh, good stuff!
LOL i saw this for the first time on the book http://www.amazon.com/Clean-Code-Handbook-Software-Craftsmanship/dp/0132350882. I was reading in the beach and start laughing by my self. Weird!