Comments on: Peppy and MooTools http://davidwalsh.name/peppy-mootools Legendary scribbles about JavaScript, HTML5, AJAX, PHP, CSS, and ∞. Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:40:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: davidhttp://davidwalsh.name/peppy-mootools/comment-page-1#comment-7706 david Mon, 09 Feb 2009 19:08:15 +0000 http://davidwalsh.name/?p=1429#comment-7706 <p>@Ryan: You stole my upcoming blog article! :) Thanks for the submission!</p> @Ryan: You stole my upcoming blog article! :) Thanks for the submission!

]]> By: Ryanhttp://davidwalsh.name/peppy-mootools/comment-page-1#comment-7705 Ryan Mon, 09 Feb 2009 18:06:42 +0000 http://davidwalsh.name/?p=1429#comment-7705 Hey guys,You can also use John Resig's Sizzle in MooTools, by using this code:Window.$$ = function(selector){ return new Elements(new Sizzle(selector)); }This overwrites the $$ function, but you can rename it to whatever you want, obviously. Hey guys,

You can also use John Resig’s Sizzle in MooTools, by using this code:

Window.$$ = function(selector){
return new Elements(new Sizzle(selector));
}

This overwrites the $$ function, but you can rename it to whatever you want, obviously.

]]> By: davidhttp://davidwalsh.name/peppy-mootools/comment-page-1#comment-7671 david Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:09:09 +0000 http://davidwalsh.name/?p=1429#comment-7671 <p>I'm not saying that I believe Peppy is better -- quite frankly, it's not. I just wanted to show you what I had at the end of my experimenting. Hell, I wouldn't even say that this is quality. It's not, quite honestly, but it worked.</p> I’m not saying that I believe Peppy is better — quite frankly, it’s not. I just wanted to show you what I had at the end of my experimenting. Hell, I wouldn’t even say that this is quality. It’s not, quite honestly, but it worked.

]]> By: carlhttp://davidwalsh.name/peppy-mootools/comment-page-1#comment-7670 carl Fri, 06 Feb 2009 18:00:30 +0000 http://davidwalsh.name/?p=1429#comment-7670 Have you even looked at the source of Peppy? I find it quite funny to compare it to Mootools or Sizzle, it's not on the same level at all. For example binding DOM mutation events for caching slows down every DOM operation a lot! Way much more than the gain of the faster queries. It gets even the attribute getter wrong: e.getAttribute( a ) || e[a]; It's good that it's small but there's a lot of space for improvements, so to say. Have you even looked at the source of Peppy? I find it quite funny to compare it to Mootools or Sizzle, it’s not on the same level at all. For example binding DOM mutation events for caching slows down every DOM operation a lot! Way much more than the gain of the faster queries. It gets even the attribute getter wrong: e.getAttribute( a ) || e[a]; It’s good that it’s small but there’s a lot of space for improvements, so to say.

]]> By: cssProdigyhttp://davidwalsh.name/peppy-mootools/comment-page-1#comment-7669 cssProdigy Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:04:33 +0000 http://davidwalsh.name/?p=1429#comment-7669 Awesome! I've been waiting for this. The Peppy selector engine is really faster, and in some tests faster than Sizzle, I thought sizzle might make it's way to MooTools but Peppy's better ayway. Awesome! I’ve been waiting for this. The Peppy selector engine is really faster, and in some tests faster than Sizzle, I thought sizzle might make it’s way to MooTools but Peppy’s better ayway.

]]>