<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: MooTools 1.2 Image Protector:&#160;dwProtector</title> <atom:link href="http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector</link> <description>Legendary scribbles about JavaScript, HTML5, AJAX, PHP, CSS, and ∞.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 14:01:31 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: god robert</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-26923</link> <dc:creator>god robert</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:17:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-26923</guid> <description>I am using the newest version of IE for Win 7...and I was able to right click on your image of the girl on your link.
How long ago was your little moo thing written?  Sorry, but it doesn&#039;t work with the newest IE (for Win 7)...haven&#039;t tried any of the other four browsers I use, but it doesn&#039;t work with the new IE.Sept. 18, 2011</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am using the newest version of IE for Win 7&#8230;and I was able to right click on your image of the girl on your link.<br
/> How long ago was your little moo thing written?  Sorry, but it doesn&#8217;t work with the newest IE (for Win 7)&#8230;haven&#8217;t tried any of the other four browsers I use, but it doesn&#8217;t work with the new IE.</p><p>Sept. 18, 2011</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mieja</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-26722</link> <dc:creator>Mieja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:49:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-26722</guid> <description>Yeesh.  Sorry about that - I swear, there WERE paragraph breaks in that second paragraph when I posted it!  Would try to repost it correctly, but I don&#039;t want to make it worse.  ;)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeesh.  Sorry about that &#8211; I swear, there WERE paragraph breaks in that second paragraph when I posted it!  Would try to repost it correctly, but I don&#8217;t want to make it worse.  ;)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mieja</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-26721</link> <dc:creator>Mieja</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 07:47:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-26721</guid> <description>Wow.  I have to say, without a doubt, that the comments on this thread are some of the most oblivious I&#039;ve ever read.  The comments are a bit like selling someone a car, warning them five times at the top of your lungs that they need to fill up the gas tank - and then having that person lead an angry mob to your door because they ran out of gas five blocks down the street.  NO, you can&#039;t definitively protect any content on the internet, and if it were to be made possible, it would make the web unusable for a lot of casual users and virtually all developers, and people would be screaming about all the things they couldn&#039;t do.  But it is a solution that will work for a casual user, or even a more technical one who doesn&#039;t want to be bothered working around it - EXACTLY AS YOU REPRESENTED IT TO BE.  Sheesh.But to add a constructive note to this message of disgust:  This comment thread underscores THE main point of failure between technical folks and non-technical folks - the fact that techies have NO clue as to what goes on in the minds of people who aren&#039;t so inclined.  Routinely, they will either expect the less-technical to know more than they do (and get condescending and/or angry if they don&#039;t) or give them credit for no intelligence whatsoever (&quot;now go to the lower left corner of your screen and click the button with the four colored boxes...&quot;).  Over and over, I have seen miscommunications of this type.  Combine this with the fact that most coders, designers and programmers are COMPLETELY unaware of the needs of the people they&#039;re building sites and apps for, and the results can be disastrous.And now I shall relate a tale from the misty age of the dot-com era, when I was working tech support for a long-gone web hosting company.  This was a time when people did actually call tech support to report that their computer&#039;s &quot;cup holder&quot; was broken (don&#039;t tell me it&#039;s an urban legend, okay, because IT HAPPENED TO ME - I put that guy on hold, announced it to the entire tech floor, and put him on speaker so that everyone could hear it for themselves; we were careful not to burst into laughter until after I&#039;d muted the line) and the company mainly targeted these clueless users as customers, offering free sign-ups to new ISP users and such.Anyway, it&#039;s some odd hour of evening, either just before or just after midnight, the pace of calls has slowed and upper management has long since left the building; the tech floor manager had dimmed the lights, someone else had music playing, a bunch of us were gaming between calls, you know, just kind of chilling and cruising through the last few hours of our shifts.So I get this call, and I spout the automatic greeting, and a gentleman - a somewhat older gentleman, from the sound of it - says, &quot;Good evening.  I&#039;m , and I make eyeglasses.&quot;This was enough of a non-sequitur to catch my attention.  &quot;Um,&quot; I said, &quot;okay...&quot;&quot;I&#039;ve been making eyeglasses for forty years,&quot; the man went on to say.  &quot;No matter what your prescription is, no matter how odd or how strong, I can make it for you.&quot;&quot;Uhhh,&quot; I said cautiously, &quot;okaaaaay,&quot; wondering where this was going.&quot;But do you know what I can&#039;t do?&quot; my caller asked me.&quot;Uhhhhhhh,&quot; I responded, figuring, okay, either it&#039;s a misguided sales call or the type of &#039;I&#039;m taking a lingerie survey, what color are your panties?&#039; calls that we female techs got sometimes.  &quot;What can&#039;t you do?&quot;The man paused, to give proper weight and emphasis to his answer.  &quot;I don&#039;t know how to make a web page,&quot; he said solemnly.  &quot;Will you help me?&quot;And after a stunned moment, I burst into laughter.  First, because his delivery was awesome (my account of events really doesn&#039;t do it justice) but also because it was such a basic, simple truth.  There was, had always been, an unvoiced assumption amongst the tech support folks, tacitly encouraged by the upper-echelon crowd, that ignorance of web technology implied stupidity - and it was at that moment that I realized that this was not merely insulting but utterly false.  It was a realization that changed my outlook and attitude toward tech support, and later, programming - and greatly facilitated later projects: instead of assuming I knew the best way to build an application, I realized that my technical knowledge didn&#039;t change the fact that I was as ignorant of my end-users&#039; needs as I was about how to make eyeglasses, and let the end users tell me what THEY needed the app to be.Heh.  Sorry to write a freakin&#039; BOOK, here, and one that&#039;s basically tangential to the topic of the post - but boy, did this bring back a string of memories.  :)Anyway, cheers to you for your patience.  :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I have to say, without a doubt, that the comments on this thread are some of the most oblivious I&#8217;ve ever read.  The comments are a bit like selling someone a car, warning them five times at the top of your lungs that they need to fill up the gas tank &#8211; and then having that person lead an angry mob to your door because they ran out of gas five blocks down the street.  NO, you can&#8217;t definitively protect any content on the internet, and if it were to be made possible, it would make the web unusable for a lot of casual users and virtually all developers, and people would be screaming about all the things they couldn&#8217;t do.  But it is a solution that will work for a casual user, or even a more technical one who doesn&#8217;t want to be bothered working around it &#8211; EXACTLY AS YOU REPRESENTED IT TO BE.  Sheesh.</p><p>But to add a constructive note to this message of disgust:  This comment thread underscores THE main point of failure between technical folks and non-technical folks &#8211; the fact that techies have NO clue as to what goes on in the minds of people who aren&#8217;t so inclined.  Routinely, they will either expect the less-technical to know more than they do (and get condescending and/or angry if they don&#8217;t) or give them credit for no intelligence whatsoever (&#8220;now go to the lower left corner of your screen and click the button with the four colored boxes&#8230;&#8221;).  Over and over, I have seen miscommunications of this type.  Combine this with the fact that most coders, designers and programmers are COMPLETELY unaware of the needs of the people they&#8217;re building sites and apps for, and the results can be disastrous.</p><p>And now I shall relate a tale from the misty age of the dot-com era, when I was working tech support for a long-gone web hosting company.  This was a time when people did actually call tech support to report that their computer&#8217;s &#8220;cup holder&#8221; was broken (don&#8217;t tell me it&#8217;s an urban legend, okay, because IT HAPPENED TO ME &#8211; I put that guy on hold, announced it to the entire tech floor, and put him on speaker so that everyone could hear it for themselves; we were careful not to burst into laughter until after I&#8217;d muted the line) and the company mainly targeted these clueless users as customers, offering free sign-ups to new ISP users and such.</p><p>Anyway, it&#8217;s some odd hour of evening, either just before or just after midnight, the pace of calls has slowed and upper management has long since left the building; the tech floor manager had dimmed the lights, someone else had music playing, a bunch of us were gaming between calls, you know, just kind of chilling and cruising through the last few hours of our shifts.</p><p>So I get this call, and I spout the automatic greeting, and a gentleman &#8211; a somewhat older gentleman, from the sound of it &#8211; says, &#8220;Good evening.  I&#8217;m , and I make eyeglasses.&#8221;</p><p>This was enough of a non-sequitur to catch my attention.  &#8220;Um,&#8221; I said, &#8220;okay&#8230;&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;I&#8217;ve been making eyeglasses for forty years,&#8221; the man went on to say.  &#8220;No matter what your prescription is, no matter how odd or how strong, I can make it for you.&#8221;</p><p>&#8220;Uhhh,&#8221; I said cautiously, &#8220;okaaaaay,&#8221; wondering where this was going.</p><p>&#8220;But do you know what I can&#8217;t do?&#8221; my caller asked me.</p><p>&#8220;Uhhhhhhh,&#8221; I responded, figuring, okay, either it&#8217;s a misguided sales call or the type of &#8216;I&#8217;m taking a lingerie survey, what color are your panties?&#8217; calls that we female techs got sometimes.  &#8220;What can&#8217;t you do?&#8221;</p><p>The man paused, to give proper weight and emphasis to his answer.  &#8220;I don&#8217;t know how to make a web page,&#8221; he said solemnly.  &#8220;Will you help me?&#8221;</p><p>And after a stunned moment, I burst into laughter.  First, because his delivery was awesome (my account of events really doesn&#8217;t do it justice) but also because it was such a basic, simple truth.  There was, had always been, an unvoiced assumption amongst the tech support folks, tacitly encouraged by the upper-echelon crowd, that ignorance of web technology implied stupidity &#8211; and it was at that moment that I realized that this was not merely insulting but utterly false.  It was a realization that changed my outlook and attitude toward tech support, and later, programming &#8211; and greatly facilitated later projects: instead of assuming I knew the best way to build an application, I realized that my technical knowledge didn&#8217;t change the fact that I was as ignorant of my end-users&#8217; needs as I was about how to make eyeglasses, and let the end users tell me what THEY needed the app to be.</p><p>Heh.  Sorry to write a freakin&#8217; BOOK, here, and one that&#8217;s basically tangential to the topic of the post &#8211; but boy, did this bring back a string of memories.  :)</p><p>Anyway, cheers to you for your patience.  :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kleya</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-26385</link> <dc:creator>kleya</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Aug 2011 18:41:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-26385</guid> <description>matt, do you know where i can get a back-end script to place a watermark in the image before it gets to the users browser, as you described?
thank you</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>matt, do you know where i can get a back-end script to place a watermark in the image before it gets to the users browser, as you described?<br
/> thank you</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: wendy</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-25939</link> <dc:creator>wendy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 07:12:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-25939</guid> <description>I&#039;ve been looking for something to prevent image download
How can I implement this code I have now a javascript thumbnail fading to large image script...
thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for something to prevent image download<br
/> How can I implement this code I have now a javascript thumbnail fading to large image script&#8230;<br
/> thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Novice</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-20860</link> <dc:creator>Novice</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:02:23 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-20860</guid> <description>Ummm...Why would a novice steal an image and even if I did, how would you protect an image from me taking a photo from my mobile phone?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm&#8230;Why would a novice steal an image and even if I did, how would you protect an image from me taking a photo from my mobile phone?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: tokat nakliyat</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-19410</link> <dc:creator>tokat nakliyat</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:58:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-19410</guid> <description>good code thanks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good code thanks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 123doing</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-18110</link> <dc:creator>123doing</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:49:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-18110</guid> <description>It&#039;s very good.
I like this.
Thanks for share.
And I wrote something to introduce this project for my readers.
You can find the post about this in my website.
If something is wrong,pls figure it out.thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very good.<br
/> I like this.<br
/> Thanks for share.<br
/> And I wrote something to introduce this project for my readers.<br
/> You can find the post about this in my website.<br
/> If something is wrong,pls figure it out.thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: piotr</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-18035</link> <dc:creator>piotr</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 09:50:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-18035</guid> <description>Jovica &gt;
I guess that most people who don&#039;t use Windows OS know how to get the images despite any protector. But then I believe the rate of people who use it inappropriately is lower among them.The other side are BFU&#039;s.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jovica &gt;<br
/> I guess that most people who don&#8217;t use Windows OS know how to get the images despite any protector. But then I believe the rate of people who use it inappropriately is lower among them.</p><p>The other side are BFU&#8217;s.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jovica</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mootools-image-protector-dwprotector#comment-18032</link> <dc:creator>Jovica</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:22:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=343#comment-18032</guid> <description>I tried on Ubuntu 10.04 with Chrome 5.0.375.70 and FF 3.6.3. I could save image from right-click menu and by draging it.Anyways, thanks for the effort. Keep up with good work.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tried on Ubuntu 10.04 with Chrome 5.0.375.70 and FF 3.6.3. I could save image from right-click menu and by draging it.</p><p>Anyways, thanks for the effort. Keep up with good work.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/7 queries in 0.009 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 805/805 objects using disk: basic

Served from: davidwalsh.name @ 2012-05-23 09:48:58 -->
