<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Mailbag Q &amp; A II&#160;Answers</title> <atom:link href="http://davidwalsh.name/mailbag-ii-answers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mailbag-ii-answers</link> <description>Legendary scribbles about JavaScript, HTML5, AJAX, PHP, CSS, and ∞.</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 04:02:29 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: rpflo</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mailbag-ii-answers#comment-7697</link> <dc:creator>rpflo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 08 Feb 2009 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=1378#comment-7697</guid> <description>Drop IE6?  Depends on the site.Typically if the content of the page for visitors is straightforward and &quot;brochure&quot;-like, I&#039;ll support it.For a more complex site that is more of an application than a brochure I charge a lot of extra to support IE6 (if possible)--or at least give the IE6 visitor something to do at the site, albeit very different from the real one.But for the admin side of a website I don&#039;t support it anymore--ever (and usually just ignore IE 7 as well).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drop IE6?  Depends on the site.</p><p>Typically if the content of the page for visitors is straightforward and &#8220;brochure&#8221;-like, I&#8217;ll support it.</p><p>For a more complex site that is more of an application than a brochure I charge a lot of extra to support IE6 (if possible)&#8211;or at least give the IE6 visitor something to do at the site, albeit very different from the real one.</p><p>But for the admin side of a website I don&#8217;t support it anymore&#8211;ever (and usually just ignore IE 7 as well).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dmitry-Sh</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mailbag-ii-answers#comment-7668</link> <dc:creator>Dmitry-Sh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:35:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=1378#comment-7668</guid> <description>I&#039;ve dropped the support for IE 6.0 already, as it was done by Apple.&lt;blockquote&gt;
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13786/should-we-support-ie6-anymore
Is it time to do away with IE6 programming?
Yes.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve dropped the support for IE 6.0 already, as it was done by Apple.</p><blockquote><p> <a
href="http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13786/should-we-support-ie6-anymore" rel="nofollow">http://stackoverflow.com/questions/13786/should-we-support-ie6-anymore</a><br
/> Is it time to do away with IE6 programming?<br
/> Yes.</p></blockquote> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: cssProdigy</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mailbag-ii-answers#comment-7659</link> <dc:creator>cssProdigy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:59:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=1378#comment-7659</guid> <description>Great mailbag. I completely agree with what you said about IE6 but if we as designers and developers don&#039;t drop support or provide a way for users to upgrade, people will still be using IE6. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great mailbag. I completely agree with what you said about IE6 but if we as designers and developers don&#8217;t drop support or provide a way for users to upgrade, people will still be using IE6.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Sanborn</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/mailbag-ii-answers#comment-7654</link> <dc:creator>Mark Sanborn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:05:14 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=1378#comment-7654</guid> <description>I got a tweet from Eric Meyer just a bit ago that said, there were still a million people using IE5.01.  Depending on your site and how important these types of users are to you, I don&#039;t think many of us can get rid of IE6 any time soon.Like you have pointed out, not everyone is a tech person.  Many people don&#039;t keep her machine up to date.  Let alone care what browser they are using.Fortunately IE gives us a way to provide IE specific content and there are JS scripts that help old versions of IE to become more compatible.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got a tweet from Eric Meyer just a bit ago that said, there were still a million people using IE5.01.  Depending on your site and how important these types of users are to you, I don&#8217;t think many of us can get rid of IE6 any time soon.</p><p>Like you have pointed out, not everyone is a tech person.  Many people don&#8217;t keep her machine up to date.  Let alone care what browser they are using.</p><p>Fortunately IE gives us a way to provide IE specific content and there are JS scripts that help old versions of IE to become more compatible.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/7 queries in 0.008 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 451/451 objects using disk: basic

Served from: davidwalsh.name @ 2012-05-23 05:36:23 -->
