<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Video:  Speed Up Your&#160;JavaScript</title> <atom:link href="http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed</link> <description>Legendary scribbles about JavaScript, HTML5, AJAX, PHP, CSS, and ∞.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <item><title>By: Dvorkin</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed/comment-page-1#comment-17860</link> <dc:creator>Dvorkin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 06:59:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=4938#comment-17860</guid> <description>Thank you for a good link and Mootools, David!
I&#039;m just the user of Moo, I like it. Only one thing that makes me unhappy with moo - is to much time, required for library initialization.
I&#039;m constantly optimizing my servers and sites to give users faster and earler page view as much as I can and the last bottleneck is JS library initialization time.
When I&#039;m looking at Firebug in FF I see mootools is blocking all images , asking browser to wait for it&#039;s initialization. It takes about 0.5-0.8 seconds for browser to figure out that it can continue load multimedia objects on page after mootools load.0.5-0.8 seconds is significant for me, becose some of my users have too much hops (asia) to my servers and usually pages is loading in 1.5 seconds. 0.8 - is the half (!), not filled with any useful actions page load time, too big comparing with total page load time.
Yes, mootools is loading from page header.
According to YSlow or Page Speed recommendations I could move mootools to the end of the page, but I&#039;m worry about document.write calls, that could not modify page objects in some initialization functions that you&#039;re using and  I donw&#039;t deeply know...So my questions is:
1) Can I do &quot;late&quot; or &quot;parallel with loading static multimedia objects&quot; initialization of mootools library somehow?
2) can I safety move whole mootools (or some parts of the library) to the page bottom to prevent browser blocking on objects loading?
3) what methods you&#039;ll advise to speedup parallel page loading with whole (core and nc) mootools?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for a good link and Mootools, David!<br
/> I&#8217;m just the user of Moo, I like it. Only one thing that makes me unhappy with moo &#8211; is to much time, required for library initialization.<br
/> I&#8217;m constantly optimizing my servers and sites to give users faster and earler page view as much as I can and the last bottleneck is JS library initialization time.<br
/> When I&#8217;m looking at Firebug in FF I see mootools is blocking all images , asking browser to wait for it&#8217;s initialization. It takes about 0.5-0.8 seconds for browser to figure out that it can continue load multimedia objects on page after mootools load.</p><p>0.5-0.8 seconds is significant for me, becose some of my users have too much hops (asia) to my servers and usually pages is loading in 1.5 seconds. 0.8 &#8211; is the half (!), not filled with any useful actions page load time, too big comparing with total page load time.<br
/> Yes, mootools is loading from page header.<br
/> According to YSlow or Page Speed recommendations I could move mootools to the end of the page, but I&#8217;m worry about document.write calls, that could not modify page objects in some initialization functions that you&#8217;re using and  I donw&#8217;t deeply know&#8230;</p><p>So my questions is:<br
/> 1) Can I do &#8220;late&#8221; or &#8220;parallel with loading static multimedia objects&#8221; initialization of mootools library somehow?<br
/> 2) can I safety move whole mootools (or some parts of the library) to the page bottom to prevent browser blocking on objects loading?<br
/> 3) what methods you&#8217;ll advise to speedup parallel page loading with whole (core and nc) mootools?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simon</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed/comment-page-1#comment-16727</link> <dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 10:09:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=4938#comment-16727</guid> <description>Awesome video, currently in the process of writing it up into a full blog post and I came across something pertaining to MooToolsDoes the method &quot;setStyles&quot; cause multiple reflows?[code]
element.setStyles({
height: &quot;100px&quot;,
display: &quot;block&quot;,
fontsize: &quot;130%&quot;
})
[/code]will that cause 1 or 3 reflows?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome video, currently in the process of writing it up into a full blog post and I came across something pertaining to MooTools</p><p>Does the method &#8220;setStyles&#8221; cause multiple reflows?</p><p>[code]<br
/> element.setStyles({<br
/> height: "100px",<br
/> display: "block",<br
/> fontsize: "130%"<br
/> })<br
/> [/code]</p><p>will that cause 1 or 3 reflows?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Crispijn</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed/comment-page-1#comment-16696</link> <dc:creator>Crispijn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 10:01:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=4938#comment-16696</guid> <description>How do I track the execution time of my script in several browsers? I&#039;d like to see what kind of improvement I&#039;ll make when I&#039;m adjusting my scripts and classes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I track the execution time of my script in several browsers? I&#8217;d like to see what kind of improvement I&#8217;ll make when I&#8217;m adjusting my scripts and classes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Crispijn</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed/comment-page-1#comment-16695</link> <dc:creator>Crispijn</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 08:54:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=4938#comment-16695</guid> <description>Well, removing the each() function is not the solution I think... How would you make a sortable list or something like that dynamically? I don&#039;t know another solution for that, you&#039;ll have to select EACH element so you use an each function I gues.... Maybe David does?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, removing the each() function is not the solution I think&#8230; How would you make a sortable list or something like that dynamically? I don&#8217;t know another solution for that, you&#8217;ll have to select EACH element so you use an each function I gues&#8230;. Maybe David does?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jean-Nicolas Boulay Desjardins</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed/comment-page-1#comment-16655</link> <dc:creator>Jean-Nicolas Boulay Desjardins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:51:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=4938#comment-16655</guid> <description>Thanks for sharing.I will also have to re-write some of my code.I&#039;m wandering if Mootools should remove .each(); to encourage good performance practice? Or at least put a note in the documentation warning that it will slow down the code...Also, is DocumentFragment use in Mootools to speed accessing the DOM?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing.</p><p>I will also have to re-write some of my code.</p><p>I&#8217;m wandering if Mootools should remove .each(); to encourage good performance practice? Or at least put a note in the documentation warning that it will slow down the code&#8230;</p><p>Also, is DocumentFragment use in Mootools to speed accessing the DOM?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matti Salokangas</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed/comment-page-1#comment-16646</link> <dc:creator>Matti Salokangas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:06:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=4938#comment-16646</guid> <description>Thank you for sharing, huge help and now i&#039;ve got gobs and gobs of javascript to go refactor.  :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for sharing, huge help and now i&#8217;ve got gobs and gobs of javascript to go refactor.  :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dr.Death</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed/comment-page-1#comment-16642</link> <dc:creator>Dr.Death</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 16:11:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=4938#comment-16642</guid> <description>It&#039;s refactoring time :D</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s refactoring time :D</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Adam Meyer</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/javascript-speed/comment-page-1#comment-16641</link> <dc:creator>Adam Meyer</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:24:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=4938#comment-16641</guid> <description>Wow... is my scripting really that bad?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230; is my scripting really that bad?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/15 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 735/736 objects using disk: basic

Served from: davidwalsh.name @ 2012-02-09 01:26:45 -->
