Treehouse

Implementing an Array.count() Method in JavaScript

By on  

As much as I write about MooTools on my blog, I spend most of my work day knee-deep in PHP. As you probably know, one way to get the size of an array in PHP is to use the count() function:

echo count($my_array);

In JavaScript, the way to get the size of an array is to use the length property, like this:

alert(my_array.length);

For some reason, I absolutely hate the ".length" way of retrieving the length of an array. For this reason, I've implement the count() method into JavaScript:

Array.prototype.count = function() {
	return this.length;
};

The count() habit is difficult to break, so why try?

ydkjs-3.png

Recent Features

  • Camera and Video Control with HTML5

    Client-side APIs on mobile and desktop devices are quickly providing the same APIs.  Of course our mobile devices got access to some of these APIs first, but those APIs are slowly making their way to the desktop.  One of those APIs is the getUserMedia API,...

  • Introducing MooTools Templated

    One major problem with creating UI components with the MooTools JavaScript framework is that there isn't a great way of allowing customization of template and ease of node creation. As of today, there are two ways of creating: new Element Madness The first way to create UI-driven...

Incredible Demos

  • MooTools, mediaboxAdvanced, and Mexico

    The lightbox is probably one of my favorite parts of the Web 2.0 revolution. No more having to open new windows (which can bog down your computer quite a bit) to see a larger image, video, etc. Instead, the item loads right into the...

  • Pure CSS Slide Up and Slide Down

    If I can avoid using JavaScript for element animations, I'm incredibly happy and driven to do so.  They're more efficient, don't require a JavaScript framework to manage steps, and they're more elegant.  One effect that is difficult to nail down with pure CSS is sliding up...

Discussion

  1. Thanks for your blog. you offer great advice and tutorials and for some odd reason, if I am looking to see how to complete a task, you have a tutorial on it or at least an idea on the concept I am trying to achieve; so thanks David. Although this post came about 2 days too late. :)

  2. Do you do this for strings as well?

  3. @Binny: No, I don’t. Just arrays.

  4. Jason

    This is all fine and well, but length is fundamentally different from count.

    Take the following example:

    var myArray = ['one', 'two', 'three'];
    // myArray.length == 3, as we would expect

    var myOtherArray[100] = ‘one';
    //myArray.length == 100, NOT 1

    Even though we only have 1 item in the array, ‘length’ refers to the largest index + 1. Unlike PHP where we can use numeric keys and strings for indexes in an ad hoc way and still get an accurate count via count(), in JS it’s not quite the same.

    In a way, this is just splitting hairs, but a lot of people already don’t understand JS’s length property, and referring to it as “count” only serves to further the confusion.

  5. Jason

    Correction to my previous post:

    the second code snippet would be:

    var myOtherArray = [];
    myOtherArray[100] = ‘one';

    and its length property would actually return 101.

  6. riv

    That’s right and that’s what I was expecting when searching for count on js. This should do it:

    function count(array)
    {
        var c = 0;
        for(i in array) // in returns key, not object
            if(array[i] != undefined)
                c++;
    
    return c;
    }
    
    • Riv, thats a much better form of the count use. Its surprising that this is not built into javascript.

  7. Christian
    Array.prototype.count = function () {
        for (k in this) { if (this[k].constructor !== Function) { this.length++; } };
        return this.length;
    }
    
  8. I think it’s okay for personal project but it has a counter side when you are in enterprise. The maintainability is harder when people use custom extension (prototype existing framework object). It cane be confusing. In some case, I have seen people creating function to simply get an object inside an array. I think this should be used with parsimony. But, it’s just my opinion…

  9. Iskren Antonov
    Array.prototype.count = function () {
    	var counter = 0; // Initializing main counter
    	for(i in this) // Looping through elements
    		if(typeof this[i] != "undefined") // If empty it's undefined
    			counter++; // Counting not empty elements
    	return counter-1; // Excepting own function
    }
    

    This is a working one. It counts function elements too.

  10. Lineo

    I’ve just bumped into learning Js, I try to be as attentive as possible but, I don’t find a way. So, may any one help me how to understand Js programming.

  11. Rowan Adinghey
    Array.prototype.count = function (a) {
    	var c = 0;
    	for(var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
    		if(typeof(this[i]) !== "undefined") {
    			if(typeof(this[i]) == "string" && this[i].length == 0) {
    			} else { 
    				c++;
    			}
    		}
    	}
    	return c;
    }
    

    OR

    
    count = function (a) {
    	var c = 0;
    	for(var i = 0; i < this.length; i++) {
    		if(typeof(a[i]) !== "undefined") {
    			if(typeof(a[i]) == "string" && a[i].length == 0) {
    			} else { 
    				c++;
    			}
    		}
    	}
    	return c;
    }
    

    Wow, no functionality to edit comments? What is this, the year 2001?

Wrap your code in <pre class="{language}"></pre> tags, link to a GitHub gist, JSFiddle fiddle, or CodePen pen to embed!