<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google Font&#160;API</title> <atom:link href="http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api</link> <description>Legendary scribbles about JavaScript, HTML5, AJAX, PHP, CSS, and ∞.</description> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 02:40:12 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <item><title>By: Daniel Due</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-22640</link> <dc:creator>Daniel Due</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:02:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-22640</guid> <description>Hi DavidThanks for this great blog.The Google font API rocks.Ive implemented it in a joomla template. The user can choose from 13 gogole fonts, in template parameters: Ive only choosen the readable fonts, because i didn&#039;t know i could include more than one font. That would be great with 2 different fonts, for headlines and text :)I used the simple version:
&lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=params-&gt;get(&quot;font&quot;); ?&gt;params-&gt;get(&quot;fontStyle&quot;); ?&gt;&quot;&gt;Although the javascript version i alluring :DBy using callback, you said that the font is preloaded! Does that mean than you won&#039;t see the font change on load?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi David</p><p>Thanks for this great blog.</p><p>The Google font API rocks.</p><p>Ive implemented it in a joomla template. The user can choose from 13 gogole fonts, in template parameters: Ive only choosen the readable fonts, because i didn&#8217;t know i could include more than one font. That would be great with 2 different fonts, for headlines and text :)</p><p>I used the simple version:<br
/> &lt;link rel=&quot;stylesheet&quot; type=&quot;text/css&quot; href=&quot;<a
href="http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=params-&gt;get(" rel="nofollow">http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=params-&gt;get(</a>&#8220;font&#8221;); ?&gt;params-&gt;get(&#8220;fontStyle&#8221;); ?&gt;&#8221;&gt;</p><p>Although the javascript version i alluring :D</p><p>By using callback, you said that the font is preloaded! Does that mean than you won&#8217;t see the font change on load?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Evan</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-22394</link> <dc:creator>Evan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 17:57:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-22394</guid> <description>Even with Google&#039;s method there&#039;s still a delay as the font downloads. This is the thing that keeps me from using embedded fonts.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even with Google&#8217;s method there&#8217;s still a delay as the font downloads. This is the thing that keeps me from using embedded fonts.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jorgen</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-19122</link> <dc:creator>Jorgen</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 19:30:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-19122</guid> <description>Using the Google Font API is now easier than ever with the new preview tool. See more here:http://tips4php.net/2010/07/google-font-api-new-preview-function/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using the Google Font API is now easier than ever with the new preview tool. See more here:</p><p><a
href="http://tips4php.net/2010/07/google-font-api-new-preview-function/" rel="nofollow">http://tips4php.net/2010/07/google-font-api-new-preview-function/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: mike i</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-19093</link> <dc:creator>mike i</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 23:46:59 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-19093</guid> <description>I&#039;ve found that some fonts from the Google Font API don&#039;t display properly in Chrome or Internet Explorer, I show the solution here:http://webdesignandsuch.com/2010/07/fix-fonts-that-dont-work-with-google-font-api-in-internet-explorer-or-chrome-with-font-face/</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found that some fonts from the Google Font API don&#8217;t display properly in Chrome or Internet Explorer, I show the solution here:</p><p><a
href="http://webdesignandsuch.com/2010/07/fix-fonts-that-dont-work-with-google-font-api-in-internet-explorer-or-chrome-with-font-face/" rel="nofollow">http://webdesignandsuch.com/2010/07/fix-fonts-that-dont-work-with-google-font-api-in-internet-explorer-or-chrome-with-font-face/</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dan</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-18614</link> <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:19:39 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-18614</guid> <description>You can just use the CSS from Google if you don&#039;t want to use the Javascript, it contains full file paths hosted on their servers so saves the hit on yours. If its anything like their JavaScript libs its on a CDN too so will be quick.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can just use the CSS from Google if you don&#8217;t want to use the Javascript, it contains full file paths hosted on their servers so saves the hit on yours. If its anything like their JavaScript libs its on a CDN too so will be quick.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mneme</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-18609</link> <dc:creator>Mneme</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 18:30:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-18609</guid> <description>I don&#039;t really see the point of it to be perfectly honest. @font-face CSS works like a charm and most of the Google Fonts seem to be regular open Fonts that you can find on FontSquirrel.Instead you have to rely on an external provider and Javascript... I mean I guess that I really shouldn&#039;t argue against Google reliability but the latter however. As Brian already mentioned, doing something in JS that should be done in a stylesheet just seems like a bad idea.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t really see the point of it to be perfectly honest. @font-face CSS works like a charm and most of the Google Fonts seem to be regular open Fonts that you can find on FontSquirrel.</p><p>Instead you have to rely on an external provider and Javascript&#8230; I mean I guess that I really shouldn&#8217;t argue against Google reliability but the latter however. As Brian already mentioned, doing something in JS that should be done in a stylesheet just seems like a bad idea.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Marc Fowler</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-18605</link> <dc:creator>Marc Fowler</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:59:47 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-18605</guid> <description>I don&#039;t think that Google are &#039;trying to make websites dependent upon them&#039;. I think it&#039;s something they want to use, so built, and so let everyone use.Because the cost of running it is surely negated by the good press that surrounds their pretty open approach to everything.I think it&#039;s awesome.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that Google are &#8216;trying to make websites dependent upon them&#8217;. I think it&#8217;s something they want to use, so built, and so let everyone use.</p><p>Because the cost of running it is surely negated by the good press that surrounds their pretty open approach to everything.</p><p>I think it&#8217;s awesome.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Walsh</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-18601</link> <dc:creator>David Walsh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:40:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-18601</guid> <description>@Brian Walker:  I like that they provide callbacks with JavaScript.  Beside that, I don&#039;t see a giant advantage either.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian Walker:  I like that they provide callbacks with JavaScript.  Beside that, I don&#8217;t see a giant advantage either.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex Crooks</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-18600</link> <dc:creator>Alex Crooks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:37:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-18600</guid> <description>Tried this couple of weeks ago, very simple to use, lets hope they add more fonts soon!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tried this couple of weeks ago, very simple to use, lets hope they add more fonts soon!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Brian Walker</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/google-fonts-api/comment-page-1#comment-18599</link> <dc:creator>Brian Walker</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 14:31:21 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=5005#comment-18599</guid> <description>FontSquirrel.com is a great resource I&#039;ve found for both open fonts and building you a nice chunk of @font-face code.On the other hand, are there any advantages to the JavaScript method?  @font-face works well in IE6+, Firefox, and every other browser I&#039;ve tested.  Isn&#039;t adding Javascript for something that can be accomplished with CSS a bad idea?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FontSquirrel.com is a great resource I&#8217;ve found for both open fonts and building you a nice chunk of @font-face code.</p><p>On the other hand, are there any advantages to the JavaScript method?  @font-face works well in IE6+, Firefox, and every other browser I&#8217;ve tested.  Isn&#8217;t adding Javascript for something that can be accomplished with CSS a bad idea?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/17 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 865/866 objects using disk: basic

Served from: davidwalsh.name @ 2012-02-09 01:30:02 -->
