<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Check for Function and Class Existence Using&#160;PHP</title> <atom:link href="http://davidwalsh.name/function-class-exists-php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://davidwalsh.name/function-class-exists-php</link> <description>Legendary scribbles about JavaScript, HTML5, AJAX, PHP, CSS, and ∞.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 16:21:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: coderbari</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/function-class-exists-php#comment-3968</link> <dc:creator>coderbari</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 07:08:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=791#comment-3968</guid> <description>Thanks for this cool idea. Sometime it really becomes hard to follow other developers of the team, so this idea will really help. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this cool idea. Sometime it really becomes hard to follow other developers of the team, so this idea will really help.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jestep</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/function-class-exists-php#comment-3961</link> <dc:creator>Jestep</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 00:08:10 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=791#comment-3961</guid> <description>It seems a little redundant to check for class existence when you&#039;re trying to create a new class. If the class does exist, then you want yours to be named something else so that it can be used. I would personally want an error in the example above, so I knew to rename the class.It would make sense to check for the class before instantiating it, but to check for the class before creating it, seems like it could create some confusing situations.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems a little redundant to check for class existence when you&#8217;re trying to create a new class. If the class does exist, then you want yours to be named something else so that it can be used. I would personally want an error in the example above, so I knew to rename the class.</p><p>It would make sense to check for the class before instantiating it, but to check for the class before creating it, seems like it could create some confusing situations.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/7 queries in 0.005 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 333/333 objects using disk: basic

Served from: davidwalsh.name @ 2012-05-22 18:27:52 -->
