<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Confessions of an Eccentric Web&#160;Developer</title> <atom:link href="http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer</link> <description>Legendary scribbles about JavaScript, HTML5, AJAX, PHP, CSS, and ∞.</description> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 21:35:58 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator> <item><title>By: epsi</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-11583</link> <dc:creator>epsi</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-11583</guid> <description>Re: #17. Joomla still keeping the faith with mootools.
Mootools 1.2.3 included in Joomla 1.6 alpha.It will push their user to learn mootools.
http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?f=502&amp;t=273960It is simpler for beginner not to switch from what is already included.
The case is unique here, since coder usually try moo first before search for other.Dunno &#039;bout other CMS.
But some web-framework still decide not to be JS agnostic.It will also push user to learn other for the same reason.What do we need to keep moo alive beside faith?Note: J1.6a has php class called JQuery to handle SQL. And it has nothing to do with JavaScript.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: #17. Joomla still keeping the faith with mootools.<br
/> Mootools 1.2.3 included in Joomla 1.6 alpha.</p><p>It will push their user to learn mootools.<br
/> <a
href="http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?f=502&amp;t=273960" rel="nofollow">http://forum.joomla.org/viewtopic.php?f=502&amp;t=273960</a></p><p>It is simpler for beginner not to switch from what is already included.<br
/> The case is unique here, since coder usually try moo first before search for other.</p><p>Dunno &#8217;bout other CMS.<br
/> But some web-framework still decide not to be JS agnostic.</p><p>It will also push user to learn other for the same reason.</p><p>What do we need to keep moo alive beside faith?</p><p>Note: J1.6a has php class called JQuery to handle SQL. And it has nothing to do with JavaScript.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bogdan.s</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-2435</link> <dc:creator>bogdan.s</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 07:55:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-2435</guid> <description>re #13: The best browser in my opinion, is the first opened when you start developing. Even if you made a simple HTML + CSS page, or an advanced js application.
Actually, IE is the last browser I&#039;m using (just) for testing, but I&#039;m not sure this is the best practice. </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>re #13: The best browser in my opinion, is the first opened when you start developing. Even if you made a simple HTML + CSS page, or an advanced js application.<br
/> Actually, IE is the last browser I&#8217;m using (just) for testing, but I&#8217;m not sure this is the best practice.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: clum</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-2123</link> <dc:creator>clum</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 21:44:07 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-2123</guid> <description>well I&#039;m loving your confessions, but move on! some of us 30+ have been there done that.. and the the t-shirt has shrunk nowwhat you say now about JS about only using it to enhance, agreed but ermm that sounds a lot familiar about what has  been said about CSS/JS for the last goodness knows how long.. and so your #9 is whacked and I&#039;ll join in that one as I&#039;m sure will many others unless it&#039;s css-off then I&#039;m not in as it&#039;s failing miserably</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well I&#8217;m loving your confessions, but move on! some of us 30+ have been there done that.. and the the t-shirt has shrunk now</p><p>what you say now about JS about only using it to enhance, agreed but ermm that sounds a lot familiar about what has  been said about CSS/JS for the last goodness knows how long.. and so your #9 is whacked and I&#8217;ll join in that one as I&#8217;m sure will many others unless it&#8217;s css-off then I&#8217;m not in as it&#8217;s failing miserably</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Braxo</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-1238</link> <dc:creator>Braxo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 18:36:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-1238</guid> <description>I agree with you on 2, 4, 5, 7, and 9.Re 2: I used Firefox all the time, didn&#039;t even have Safari on my Dock. But with Apple&#039;s new release of it (3.1) I have now switched to it 100%. I fell in love with the developer window.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on 2, 4, 5, 7, and 9.</p><p>Re 2: I used Firefox all the time, didn&#8217;t even have Safari on my Dock. But with Apple&#8217;s new release of it (3.1) I have now switched to it 100%. I fell in love with the developer window.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: httpwebwitch</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-1177</link> <dc:creator>httpwebwitch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:06:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-1177</guid> <description>I meant to type &quot;like&quot;, not &quot;life&quot;, as in &quot;I like sifr&quot;.
My typing skills are awful, I go too fast. That was one of my confessions...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to type &#8220;like&#8221;, not &#8220;life&#8221;, as in &#8220;I like sifr&#8221;.<br
/> My typing skills are awful, I go too fast. That was one of my confessions&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: httpwebwitch</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-1176</link> <dc:creator>httpwebwitch</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 15:03:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-1176</guid> <description>dunno if you have pingbacks going on here. I did a response to your post over here:
http://www.ianring.com/blog/2008/05/confessions-of-a-web-developer/I like reading your blog, I&#039;ve been subscribed for a while now.
I don&#039;t agree with some of the opinions in your confession, for instance, I life sifr, and I don&#039;t agree with the futility of JavaScript; it&#039;s so ubiquitous, no one really turns it off anymore except stodgy JavaScript developers. But what&#039;s the point of disagreeing? it&#039;s a confession, not a thesis.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dunno if you have pingbacks going on here. I did a response to your post over here:<br
/> <a
href="http://www.ianring.com/blog/2008/05/confessions-of-a-web-developer/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ianring.com/blog/2008/05/confessions-of-a-web-developer/</a></p><p>I like reading your blog, I&#8217;ve been subscribed for a while now.<br
/> I don&#8217;t agree with some of the opinions in your confession, for instance, I life sifr, and I don&#8217;t agree with the futility of JavaScript; it&#8217;s so ubiquitous, no one really turns it off anymore except stodgy JavaScript developers. But what&#8217;s the point of disagreeing? it&#8217;s a confession, not a thesis.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Jeffrey Way</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-1168</link> <dc:creator>Jeffrey Way</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:23:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-1168</guid> <description>&quot;I visit my own blog all the time to look things up.&quot;Gosh..that is funny. I do the same thing.And I completely agree with you about the sifr stuff. I briefly implemented that into my site. After a week, I just couldn&#039;t stand it...it was removed!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I visit my own blog all the time to look things up.&#8221;</p><p>Gosh..that is funny. I do the same thing.</p><p>And I completely agree with you about the sifr stuff. I briefly implemented that into my site. After a week, I just couldn&#8217;t stand it&#8230;it was removed!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: keif</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-1167</link> <dc:creator>keif</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-1167</guid> <description>RE: MooTools/JS:Sadly, it&#039;s always the nature of the beast, isn&#039;t it? I&#039;m with you on your thoughts abotu mooTools toxicity, and totally with you on JS being ENHANCEMENT, not core functionality.I guess that&#039;s the difference between a good developer and a great one - being that your site works with JS off (of course, it ALSO depends on your audience - do you care if the paranoid sysadmin can&#039;t shop at your site because he doesn&#039;t have JS on? :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE: MooTools/JS:</p><p>Sadly, it&#8217;s always the nature of the beast, isn&#8217;t it? I&#8217;m with you on your thoughts abotu mooTools toxicity, and totally with you on JS being ENHANCEMENT, not core functionality.</p><p>I guess that&#8217;s the difference between a good developer and a great one &#8211; being that your site works with JS off (of course, it ALSO depends on your audience &#8211; do you care if the paranoid sysadmin can&#8217;t shop at your site because he doesn&#8217;t have JS on? :)</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: david</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-1163</link> <dc:creator>david</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:44:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-1163</guid> <description>@All:  I don&#039;t lay in fear of someone not having javascript on.  It&#039;s just that you can&#039;t build javascript into the core of your website sometimes.  Javascript should be to enhance, not for core functionality.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@All:  I don&#8217;t lay in fear of someone not having javascript on.  It&#8217;s just that you can&#8217;t build javascript into the core of your website sometimes.  Javascript should be to enhance, not for core functionality.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: david</title><link>http://davidwalsh.name/confessions-of-an-eccentric-web-developer/comment-page-1#comment-1162</link> <dc:creator>david</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 12:41:36 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davidwalsh.name/?p=254#comment-1162</guid> <description>@Richard:  You got me.  Let me add a number 18:  I don&#039;t proofread my articles well enough.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard:  You got me.  Let me add a number 18:  I don&#8217;t proofread my articles well enough.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/19 queries in 0.017 seconds using disk

Served from: davidwalsh.name @ 2010-09-08 02:58:20 -->